PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAFL vs. HYFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAFL vs. HYFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF (TAFL) and AB High Yield ETF (HYFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAFL achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than HYFI's 1.96% return.


TAFL

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.96%
6M
0.62%
YTD
0.99%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.28%

HYFI

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.13%
6M
1.08%
YTD
1.96%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.00M$1.67M$1.77M
$87.64K$86.63K$299.38K

TAFL vs. HYFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TAFL
AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF
0.99%3.53%2.00%2.09%
HYFI
AB High Yield ETF
1.96%8.91%7.98%2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TAFL and HYFI is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2023

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAFL vs. HYFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TAFL
TAFL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TAFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAFL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TAFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAFL Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

HYFI
HYFI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HYFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYFI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TAFL vs. HYFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF (TAFL) and AB High Yield ETF (HYFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAFLHYFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.27

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.23

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

9.76

-0.55

TAFL vs. HYFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the HYFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAFL and HYFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAFL vs. HYFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAFL drawdown since its inception was -6.01%, smaller than the maximum HYFI drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAFL and HYFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAFLHYFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-6.34%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-2.49%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.09%

-0.48%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-0.50%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.57%

+0.24%

Volatility

TAFL vs. HYFI - Volatility Comparison

AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF (TAFL) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) at 0.79%. This indicates that TAFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAFLHYFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

0.79%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

3.15%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

3.89%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.12%

5.26%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.12%

5.26%

-0.14%

TAFL vs. HYFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAFL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than HYFI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAFL vs. HYFI - Dividend Comparison

TAFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than HYFI's 6.65% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HYFI
AB High Yield ETF
6.14%6.66%6.57%4.17%
TAFL
AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF
3.80%4.11%3.88%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAFL and HYFI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAFL has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to HYFI (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAFL dropped -6.01% vs HYFI's -6.34%.

On 1-year performance, TAFL leads with 6.43% vs 5.40% for HYFI. On fees, TAFL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, HYFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TAFL has performed better with a 6.43% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAFL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYFI.

HYFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.14%, compared with 3.80% for TAFL.

TAFL is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while HYFI is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for TAFL and 0.40% for HYFI.

TAFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAFL and HYFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer