PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAFL vs. CALI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAFL vs. CALI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF (TAFL) and iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAFL achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than CALI's 0.99% return.


TAFL

1D
0.08%
1M
1.78%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.92%
1Y
8.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CALI

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.08%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAFL vs. CALI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TAFL
AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF
2.47%3.53%2.00%2.09%
CALI
iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF
0.99%3.28%2.84%0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TAFL and CALI is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2023

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAFL vs. CALI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAFL
TAFL Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TAFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAFL Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TAFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAFL Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CALI
CALI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CALI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALI Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CALI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALI Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAFL vs. CALI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF (TAFL) and iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAFLCALIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.87

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

4.19

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.35

21.38

-12.03

TAFL vs. CALI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the CALI Sharpe Ratio of 3.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAFL and CALI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAFL vs. CALI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAFL drawdown since its inception was -6.01%, which is greater than CALI's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAFL and CALI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAFLCALIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-0.78%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-0.67%

-2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.04%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-0.08%

-1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.13%

+0.75%

Volatility

TAFL vs. CALI - Volatility Comparison

AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF (TAFL) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) at 0.19%. This indicates that TAFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAFLCALIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.19%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

0.52%

+2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.24%

0.75%

+3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.15%

1.10%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.15%

1.10%

+4.05%

TAFL vs. CALI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAFL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than CALI's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAFL vs. CALI - Dividend Comparison

TAFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than CALI's 2.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CALI
iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF
2.52%2.62%3.14%1.37%
TAFL
AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF
4.07%4.11%3.88%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAFL and CALI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAFL has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to CALI (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAFL dropped -6.01% vs CALI's -0.78%.

On 1-year performance, TAFL leads with 8.23% vs 2.79% for CALI. On fees, CALI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, CALI has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TAFL has performed better with a 8.23% return vs 2.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CALI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for TAFL.

TAFL has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 2.52% for CALI.

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for TAFL and 0.08% for CALI.

CALI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAFL and CALI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer