TACU vs. TDVG
TACU (T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TACU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TDVG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TACU charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.
Performance
TACU vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TACU having a 9.87% return and TDVG slightly higher at 10.24%.
TACU
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- YTD
- 9.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TDVG
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 17.45%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.22%
TACU vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TACU T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF | 9.87% | -0.70% |
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 10.24% | 0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between TACU and TDVG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TACU vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank
TACU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TDVG
TACU vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF (TACU) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TACU | TDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.42 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TACU vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TACU drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, smaller than the maximum TDVG drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACU and TDVG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TACU | TDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -19.20% | +10.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -0.70% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.55% | -3.68% | +2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.75% | — |
Volatility
TACU vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TACU | TDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.42% | 9.68% | +3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 13.87% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 13.83% | -0.41% |
TACU vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TACU has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TACU vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison
TACU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TACU T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 0.97% | 1.00% | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.15% | 0.80% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TACU and TDVG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TACU is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TACU is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.
TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for TACU.
TACU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TDVG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for TACU and 0.50% for TDVG.
Find the right allocation for TACU and TDVG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer