TACK vs. TBFG
TACK (Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund) and TBFG (The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TACK returned 13.26% vs 24.53% for TBFG. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TACK charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TBFG.
Performance
TACK vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TACK achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than TBFG's 10.35% return.
TACK
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 13.26%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBFG
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 24.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TACK vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund | 4.86% | 10.93% | 13.09% |
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF | 10.35% | 14.56% | 10.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TACK and TBFG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2024 | 0.87 |
The correlation between TACK and TBFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
TACK vs. TBFG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TACK
TBFG
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
TACK
TBFG
Consumer Defensive
TACK
TBFG
Energy
TACK
TBFG
Industrials
TACK
TBFG
Healthcare
TACK
TBFG
Basic Materials
TACK
TBFG
Communication Services
TACK
TBFG
Consumer Cyclical
TACK
TBFG
Technology
TACK
TBFG
Financial Services
TACK
-
TBFG
Real Estate
TACK
-
TBFG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TACK vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank
TACK
TBFG
TACK vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TACK | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.47 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.23 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.16 | 13.95 | -6.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TACK | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 2.53 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.38 | -0.77 |
Drawdowns
TACK vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TACK drawdown since its inception was -14.49%, which is greater than TBFG's maximum drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACK and TBFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TACK | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.49% | -13.43% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.85% | -7.63% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -0.36% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -1.63% | -2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.76% | +0.10% |
Volatility
TACK vs. TBFG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) is 2.43%, while The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that TACK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TACK | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.43% | 3.00% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.06% | 8.00% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.46% | 9.73% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.23% | 10.95% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.23% | 10.95% | +0.28% |
TACK vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TACK has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
TACK vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison
TACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than TBFG's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund | 1.21% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 1.29% | 0.89% |
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF | 2.35% | 2.65% | 2.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TACK and TBFG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TBFG has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to TACK (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TACK dropped -14.49% vs TBFG's -13.43%.
On 1-year performance, TBFG leads with 24.53% vs 13.26% for TACK. On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, TACK has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TBFG has performed better with a 24.53% return vs 13.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for TACK.
TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.21% for TACK.
They also come from different issuers: Fairlead and The Brinsmere Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TACK and 0.42% for TBFG.
TBFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TACK and TBFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer