TACK vs. MATE
TACK (Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund) and MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TACK charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MATE.
Performance
TACK vs. MATE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TACK achieves a 7.34% return, which is significantly lower than MATE's 17.81% return.
TACK
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 7.34%
- 1Y
- 14.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.07%
MATE
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 17.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $90.69K | $212.59K | $176.45K | |
| $1.48M | $877.08K | $738.42K |
TACK vs. MATE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund | 7.34% | 0.12% |
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 17.81% | 2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between TACK and MATE is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TACK vs. MATE — Risk / Return Rank
TACK
MATE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TACK vs. MATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TACK | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.68 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TACK vs. MATE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TACK drawdown since its inception was -14.49%, which is greater than MATE's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACK and MATE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TACK | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.49% | -13.24% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -2.53% | +1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -3.48% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | — | — |
Volatility
TACK vs. MATE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TACK | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.67% | 22.40% | -12.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.16% | 22.40% | -11.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.16% | 22.40% | -11.24% |
TACK vs. MATE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TACK has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than MATE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
TACK vs. MATE - Dividend Comparison
TACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund | 1.29% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 1.29% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TACK and MATE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TACK is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TACK is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.
TACK has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.
They also come from different issuers: Fairlead and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TACK and 0.97% for MATE.
Find the right allocation for TACK and MATE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer