TAC vs. COWZ
TAC (TransAlta Corp) is a stock, while COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) is Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Over the past 5 years, TAC returned 8.27%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for COWZ. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TAC vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAC achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 8.30% return.
TAC
- 1D
- -10.37%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 6M
- -8.45%
- 1Y
- 29.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
COWZ
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- —
TAC vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAC TransAlta Corp | 3.28% | -9.24% | 73.96% | -5.50% | -18.03% | 48.90% | 8.06% | 77.05% | -29.03% | 11.23% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.30% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -10.05% | 20.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAC and COWZ is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TAC and COWZ has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAC vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
TAC
COWZ
TAC vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransAlta Corp (TAC) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAC | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.37 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 4.57 | -3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.55 | 12.47 | -10.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAC | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 2.06 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.60 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.65 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
TAC vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAC drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAC and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAC | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.12% | -38.63% | -49.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.10% | -5.00% | -28.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.26% | -22.00% | -21.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.55% | -22.00% | -24.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.34% | -0.80% | -25.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.59% | -4.80% | -35.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.27% | 1.83% | +17.44% |
Volatility
TAC vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
TransAlta Corp (TAC) has a higher volatility of 14.15% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.50%. This indicates that TAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAC | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.15% | 2.50% | +11.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.51% | 7.12% | +22.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.74% | 11.08% | +29.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.82% | 17.63% | +17.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 19.92% | +15.61% |
Dividends
TAC vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
TAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than COWZ's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.16% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
TAC TransAlta Corp | 1.48% | 1.44% | 1.24% | 2.13% | 1.76% | 1.38% | 1.69% | 1.68% | 3.20% | 2.69% | 2.74% | 20.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAC and COWZ have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAC has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to COWZ (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAC dropped -88.12% vs COWZ's -38.63%.
COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAC and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer