PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAC vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAC vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TransAlta Corp (TAC) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAC achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 8.30% return.


TAC

1D
-10.37%
1M
3.23%
YTD
3.28%
6M
-8.45%
1Y
29.77%
3Y*
11.77%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
11.45%

COWZ

1D
0.11%
1M
2.05%
YTD
8.30%
6M
8.95%
1Y
22.75%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAC vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAC
TransAlta Corp
3.28%-9.24%73.96%-5.50%-18.03%48.90%8.06%77.05%-29.03%11.23%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
8.30%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-10.05%20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between TAC and COWZ is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between TAC and COWZ has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAC vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAC
TAC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAC vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransAlta Corp (TAC) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TACCOWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.37

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

4.57

-3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.55

12.47

-10.92

TAC vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAC and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TACCOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

2.06

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.60

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.65

-0.53

Drawdowns

TAC vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAC drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAC and COWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TACCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.12%

-38.63%

-49.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.10%

-5.00%

-28.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.26%

-22.00%

-21.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.55%

-22.00%

-24.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.34%

-0.80%

-25.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.59%

-4.80%

-35.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.27%

1.83%

+17.44%

Volatility

TAC vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

TransAlta Corp (TAC) has a higher volatility of 14.15% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.50%. This indicates that TAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TACCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.15%

2.50%

+11.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.51%

7.12%

+22.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.74%

11.08%

+29.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.82%

17.63%

+17.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.53%

19.92%

+15.61%

Dividends

TAC vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

TAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than COWZ's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.16%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%0.00%
TAC
TransAlta Corp
1.48%1.44%1.24%2.13%1.76%1.38%1.69%1.68%3.20%2.69%2.74%20.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAC and COWZ have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAC has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to COWZ (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAC dropped -88.12% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAC and COWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer