PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAC vs. VST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TAC vs. VST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TransAlta Corp (TAC) and Vistra Corp. (VST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAC achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly higher than VST's 3.96% return.


TAC

1D
0.80%
1M
2.43%
YTD
10.37%
6M
11.97%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*
12.88%

VST

1D
2.29%
1M
7.18%
YTD
3.96%
6M
3.81%
1Y
-9.16%
3Y*
90.08%
5Y*
59.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAC vs. VST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAC
TransAlta Corp
10.37%-9.24%73.96%-5.50%-18.03%48.90%8.06%77.05%-29.03%11.23%
VST
Vistra Corp.
3.96%17.66%261.52%70.73%5.08%19.57%-11.87%2.46%24.95%18.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TAC and VST is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016

0.29

The correlation between TAC and VST shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TAC:

-CA$0.57

VST:

$8.60

PS Ratio

TAC:

2.66

VST:

2.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

TAC:

CA$2.21B

VST:

$17.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TAC:

CA$889.52M

VST:

$1.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

TAC:

CA$511.31M

VST:

$4.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAC vs. VST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAC
TAC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VST
VST Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
VST Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
VST Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAC vs. VST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransAlta Corp (TAC) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TACVSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.01

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

-0.24

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.41

-0.44

+1.84

TAC vs. VST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the VST Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAC and VST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAC vs. VST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAC drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than VST's maximum drawdown of -53.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAC and VST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TACVSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.12%

-53.32%

-34.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.10%

-38.01%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.26%

-48.80%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.55%

-48.80%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.28%

-22.93%

+1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.55%

-13.75%

-26.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.92%

21.06%

-1.14%

Volatility

TAC vs. VST - Volatility Comparison

TransAlta Corp (TAC) has a higher volatility of 15.58% compared to Vistra Corp. (VST) at 14.21%. This indicates that TAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TACVSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.58%

14.21%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.50%

36.96%

-7.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.20%

48.94%

-8.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.00%

48.02%

-13.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.57%

42.22%

-6.65%

Dividends

TAC vs. VST - Dividend Comparison

TAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than VST's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TAC
TransAlta Corp
1.39%1.44%1.24%2.13%1.76%1.38%1.69%1.68%3.20%2.69%2.74%20.34%
VST
Vistra Corp.
0.54%0.56%0.63%2.13%3.12%2.64%2.75%2.17%0.00%0.00%14.97%0.00%

Financials

TAC vs. VST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TransAlta Corp and Vistra Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
566.46M
5.64B
(TAC) Total Revenue
(VST) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TAC values in CAD, VST values in USD

TAC vs. VST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TransAlta Corp and Vistra Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
43.0%
0
Portfolio components
TAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransAlta Corp reported a gross profit of 243.63M and revenue of 566.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.0%.

VST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransAlta Corp reported an operating income of 24.06M and revenue of 566.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

VST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

TAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransAlta Corp reported a net income of 13.03M and revenue of 566.46M, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.

VST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 980.00M and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TAC and VST have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAC has higher volatility (15.58%) compared to VST (14.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAC dropped -88.12% vs VST's -53.32%.

TAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAC and VST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer