TAC vs. FTS
TAC (TransAlta Corp) and FTS (Fortis Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Utilities sector — TAC in Utilities - Independent Power Producers, FTS in Utilities - Regulated Electric. Over the past 5 years, TAC returned 5.55%/yr vs 8.98%/yr for FTS. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TAC vs. FTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAC achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than FTS's 11.58% return.
TAC
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- -7.20%
- 6M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.60%
FTS
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 1Y
- 18.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FTS Fortis Inc. | $44.36M | $43.80M | $42.19M |
| $21.79M | $21.28M | $22.20M |
TAC vs. FTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAC TransAlta Corp | -0.39% | -9.24% | 73.96% | -5.50% | -18.03% | 48.90% | 8.06% | 77.05% | -29.03% | 11.23% |
FTS Fortis Inc. | 11.58% | 29.62% | 5.81% | 7.38% | -13.69% | 22.73% | 1.91% | 29.00% | -5.86% | 24.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAC and FTS is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2016 | 0.33 |
The correlation between TAC and FTS shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TAC:
$3.72B
FTS:
$29.02B
TAC:
-CA$0.57
FTS:
CA$3.33
TAC:
2.39
FTS:
3.53
TAC:
11.16
FTS:
1.78
TAC:
CA$2.21B
FTS:
CA$12.22B
TAC:
CA$889.52M
FTS:
CA$7.44B
TAC:
CA$511.31M
FTS:
CA$5.80B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAC vs. FTS — Risk / Return Rank
TAC
FTS
TAC vs. FTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransAlta Corp (TAC) and Fortis Inc. (FTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAC | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.26 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 3.30 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | 8.14 | -7.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAC vs. FTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAC drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than FTS's maximum drawdown of -34.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAC and FTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAC | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.12% | -34.36% | -53.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.10% | -6.23% | -26.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.26% | -11.59% | -31.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.55% | -29.96% | -16.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.95% | -3.13% | -25.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.47% | -6.94% | -33.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.26% | 2.52% | +18.74% |
Volatility
TAC vs. FTS - Volatility Comparison
TransAlta Corp (TAC) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to Fortis Inc. (FTS) at 4.97%. This indicates that TAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAC | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.33% | 4.97% | +6.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.45% | 11.30% | +18.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.56% | 13.74% | +26.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.27% | 16.45% | +18.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 18.94% | +16.59% |
Dividends
TAC vs. FTS - Dividend Comparison
TAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than FTS's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTS Fortis Inc. | 3.22% | 3.42% | 4.62% | 4.50% | 4.48% | 3.40% | 3.54% | 3.31% | 3.35% | 4.43% | 1.30% | 0.00% |
TAC TransAlta Corp | 1.54% | 1.44% | 1.24% | 2.13% | 1.76% | 1.38% | 1.69% | 1.68% | 3.20% | 2.69% | 2.74% | 20.34% |
Financials
TAC vs. FTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TransAlta Corp and Fortis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TAC vs. FTS - Profitability Comparison
TAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TransAlta Corp reported a gross profit of 243.63M and revenue of 566.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.0%.
FTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fortis Inc. reported a gross profit of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
TAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TransAlta Corp reported an operating income of 24.06M and revenue of 566.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
FTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fortis Inc. reported an operating income of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.
TAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TransAlta Corp reported a net income of 13.03M and revenue of 566.46M, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.
FTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fortis Inc. reported a net income of 524.35M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TAC and FTS have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAC has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to FTS (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAC dropped -88.12% vs FTS's -34.36%.
FTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAC and FTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer