PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TABD vs. FLXR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TABD vs. FLXR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Bond Active ETF (TABD) and TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TABD achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than FLXR's 1.33% return.


TABD

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.41%
6M
-0.23%
YTD
0.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

FLXR

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.41%
6M
0.97%
YTD
1.33%
1Y
4.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$13.36M$16.28M$17.08M
$3.48K$4.17K$17.31K

TABD vs. FLXR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TABD
Transamerica Bond Active ETF
0.12%0.35%
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
1.33%0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between TABD and FLXR is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TABD vs. FLXR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TABD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FLXR
FLXR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FLXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXR Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TABD vs. FLXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Bond Active ETF (TABD) and TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TABDFLXRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

TABD vs. FLXR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TABD vs. FLXR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TABD drawdown since its inception was -3.01%, which is greater than FLXR's maximum drawdown of -1.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TABD and FLXR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TABDFLXRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-1.94%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-0.43%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-0.35%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

Volatility

TABD vs. FLXR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TABDFLXRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

2.35%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.83%

2.79%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.83%

2.79%

+1.04%

TABD vs. FLXR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TABD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXR's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TABD vs. FLXR - Dividend Comparison

TABD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than FLXR's 5.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
5.91%5.66%3.44%
TABD
Transamerica Bond Active ETF
2.56%0.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TABD and FLXR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TABD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TABD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FLXR.

FLXR has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 2.56% for TABD.

TABD is categorized as Actively Managed, while FLXR is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Transamerica and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TABD and 0.40% for FLXR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TABD and FLXR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer