TABD vs. SCUB
TABD (Transamerica Bond Active ETF) and SCUB (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TABD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SCUB.
Performance
TABD vs. SCUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TABD
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCUB
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TABD vs. SCUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TABD Transamerica Bond Active ETF | 1.70% |
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TABD and SCUB is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TABD vs. SCUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Bond Active ETF (TABD) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TABD vs. SCUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TABD drawdown since its inception was -3.01%, which is greater than SCUB's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TABD and SCUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TABD | SCUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -0.08% | -2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | 0.00% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -0.01% | -0.99% |
Volatility
TABD vs. SCUB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TABD | SCUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88% | 0.79% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.88% | 0.79% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.88% | 0.79% | +3.09% |
TABD vs. SCUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TABD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCUB's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TABD vs. SCUB - Dividend Comparison
TABD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than SCUB's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.33% | 0.00% |
TABD Transamerica Bond Active ETF | 2.10% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TABD and SCUB have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for TABD.
TABD has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.33% for SCUB.
They also come from different issuers: Transamerica and Sterling Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TABD and 0.30% for SCUB.
Find the right allocation for TABD and SCUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer