PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
T vs. ADM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

T vs. ADM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. (T) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than ADM's 41.55% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed ADM with an annualized return of 3.33%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.94% annualized return.


T

1D
2.52%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-12.96%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
3.33%

ADM

1D
1.70%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
41.55%
6M
35.61%
1Y
66.67%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

T vs. ADM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
T
AT&T Inc.
-2.96%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
41.55%18.24%-27.52%-20.42%39.98%37.33%12.44%17.10%5.28%-9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between T and ADM is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between T and ADM has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

T:

$3.04

ADM:

$2.23

PE Ratio

T:

7.74

ADM:

35.93

PS Ratio

T:

1.35

ADM:

0.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

T:

$125.65B

ADM:

$80.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

T:

$105.41B

ADM:

$4.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

T:

$54.70B

ADM:

$3.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

T vs. ADM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ADM
ADM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ADM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ADM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

T vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TADMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.39

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

5.24

-5.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

14.45

-15.67

T vs. ADM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current T Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the ADM Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of T and ADM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

T vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, smaller than the maximum ADM drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and ADM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TADMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.15%

-68.01%

+3.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.87%

-12.79%

-9.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.87%

-49.22%

+27.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.01%

-54.14%

+22.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

-54.14%

+11.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.12%

-8.23%

-9.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.72%

-21.59%

+5.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.64%

4.63%

+6.01%

Volatility

T vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison

AT&T Inc. (T) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) at 7.74%. This indicates that T's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TADMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

7.74%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.80%

19.56%

-1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.13%

27.30%

-5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.01%

28.26%

-4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.73%

26.96%

-3.23%

Dividends

T vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison

T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than ADM's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
2.57%3.55%3.96%2.49%1.72%2.19%2.86%3.02%3.27%3.19%2.63%3.05%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.71%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

T vs. ADM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
33.47B
20.49B
(T) Total Revenue
(ADM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


T and ADM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to ADM (7.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs ADM's -68.01%.

ADM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for T and ADM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer