PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SZNE vs. QCLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SZNE vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SZNE vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
3.24%-3.44%2.05%6.53%-12.33%2.80%
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
-5.98%11.27%20.27%28.87%-18.87%3.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SZNE achieves a 3.24% return, which is significantly higher than QCLR's -5.98% return.


SZNE

1D
0.96%
1M
-5.35%
YTD
3.24%
6M
5.08%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
0.23%
5Y*
1.28%
10Y*

QCLR

1D
0.74%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
-5.98%
6M
-5.17%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SZNE vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SZNE and QCLR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Return for Risk

SZNE vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZNE
SZNE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SZNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SZNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SZNE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SZNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SZNE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLR
QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZNE vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SZNEQCLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.22

0.95

-0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.48

1.41

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.18

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

1.14

-0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.31

4.57

-3.26

SZNE vs. QCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SZNE Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the QCLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SZNE and QCLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SZNEQCLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

0.95

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.55

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and QCLR is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SZNE vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than QCLR's 15.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
1.39%1.47%1.20%1.21%1.11%0.79%1.37%0.90%0.68%
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
15.83%14.89%8.89%0.47%0.27%1.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SZNE vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SZNE drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than QCLR's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZNE and QCLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SZNEQCLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.79%

-21.77%

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.37%

-10.22%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.95%

-8.10%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.41%

-6.32%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

2.56%

+1.27%

Volatility

SZNE vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison

Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 3.93%. This indicates that SZNE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SZNEQCLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

3.93%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.35%

8.56%

+2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

12.08%

+8.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

12.61%

+4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

12.61%

+7.58%