SZNE vs. QCLR
SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and QCLR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZNE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while QCLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
SZNE vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SZNE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QCLR
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- 6M
- -3.50%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 1Y
- 2.99%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.97K | $8.10K | $56.22K |
SZNE vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 9.68% | -3.44% | 2.05% | 6.53% | -12.33% | 2.23% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | -2.69% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 28.87% | -18.87% | 2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZNE and QCLR is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021 | 0.53 |
The correlation between SZNE and QCLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
SZNE vs. QCLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SZNE
QCLR
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
SZNE
QCLR
Financial Services
SZNE
QCLR
Industrials
SZNE
QCLR
Healthcare
SZNE
QCLR
Consumer Cyclical
SZNE
QCLR
Energy
SZNE
QCLR
Communication Services
SZNE
QCLR
Real Estate
SZNE
QCLR
Consumer Defensive
SZNE
QCLR
Basic Materials
SZNE
QCLR
Utilities
SZNE
QCLR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZNE vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank
SZNE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QCLR
SZNE vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SZNE | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SZNE vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZNE | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -21.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -4.89% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.07% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.04% | — |
Volatility
SZNE vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZNE | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 10.16% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 12.35% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 12.35% | — |
SZNE vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SZNE and QCLR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
SZNE vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison
SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than QCLR's 15.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 15.35% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.79% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZNE and QCLR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SZNE and QCLR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 15.35%, compared with 1.23% for SZNE.
SZNE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QCLR is Nasdaq-100. SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Global X.
Find the right allocation for SZNE and QCLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer