SZNE vs. HYP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SZNE is passively managed, while HYP is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SZNE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HYP.

Performance

SZNE vs. HYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SZNE achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly lower than HYP's 32.89% return.

SZNE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 9.68%
• 6M: 10.88%
• 1Y: 13.01%
• 3Y*: 3.38%
• 5Y*: 1.44%
• 10Y*: —

HYP

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 6.48%
• YTD: 32.89%
• 6M: 28.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZNE vs. HYP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF	9.68%	3.90%
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	32.89%	-5.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and HYP is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

SZNE vs. HYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZNE

SZNE Risk / Return Rank: 31
SZNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
SZNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SZNE Omega Ratio Rank: 29
SZNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SZNE Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZNE vs. HYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SZNE	HYP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.14	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SZNE	HYP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.98	-0.64

Drawdowns

SZNE vs. HYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SZNE drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than HYP's maximum drawdown of -19.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZNE and HYP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SZNE	HYP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.79%	-19.58%	-20.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.15%	-1.11%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.33%	-6.42%	-0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SZNE	HYP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.73%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.47%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.80%	40.91%	-26.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	40.91%	-23.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.10%	40.91%	-20.81%

SZNE vs. HYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HYP's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

SZNE vs. HYP - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than HYP's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	0.10%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF	1.37%	1.47%	1.20%	1.21%	1.11%	0.79%	1.37%	0.90%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SZNE and HYP in my portfolio?

SZNE and HYP have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SZNE or HYP?

On fees, SZNE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SZNE or HYP?

SZNE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SZNE or HYP?

SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.10% for HYP.

What is the main difference between SZNE and HYP?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Golden Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.85% for HYP.