PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SZNE vs. DARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SZNE vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SZNE

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DARP

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.39%
6M
23.92%
YTD
27.98%
1Y
60.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZNE vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
9.68%-3.44%2.05%6.53%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
27.98%40.19%24.63%6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and DARP is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023

0.43

The correlation between SZNE and DARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SZNE vs. DARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SZNE
DARP

Financial Services

38.7%

-

Industrials

13.0%
8.1%

Energy

9.3%
8.0%

Technology

5.6%
48.8%

Healthcare

5.1%
1.5%

Utilities

5.0%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
8.1%

Communication Services

2.9%
14.3%

Real Estate

2.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%

-

Financial Services

SZNE
38.7%
DARP

-

Industrials

SZNE
13.0%
DARP
8.1%

Energy

SZNE
9.3%
DARP
8.0%

Technology

SZNE
5.6%
DARP
48.8%

Healthcare

SZNE
5.1%
DARP
1.5%

Utilities

SZNE
5.0%
DARP
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SZNE
3.7%
DARP
8.1%

Communication Services

SZNE
2.9%
DARP
14.3%

Real Estate

SZNE
2.2%
DARP

-

Basic Materials

SZNE
1.6%
DARP
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

SZNE
1.3%
DARP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SZNE vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZNE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZNE vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SZNEDARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.78

SZNE vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SZNE vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SZNEDARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

Volatility

SZNE vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SZNEDARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.58%

SZNE vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SZNE vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than DARP's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.34%0.43%1.93%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
1.23%1.47%1.20%1.21%1.11%0.79%1.37%0.90%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SZNE and DARP have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SZNE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SZNE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.34% for DARP.

SZNE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DARP is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Grizzle. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.75% for DARP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SZNE and DARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer