SZNE vs. COWZ
SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZNE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SZNE returned 1.44%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for COWZ. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SZNE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.
Performance
SZNE vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SZNE achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 8.18% return.
SZNE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 22.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- —
SZNE vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 9.68% | -3.44% | 2.05% | 6.53% | -12.33% | 26.36% | 4.03% | 35.75% | -6.90% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.18% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -14.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZNE and COWZ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SZNE and COWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
SZNE vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SZNE
COWZ
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
SZNE
COWZ
Technology
SZNE
COWZ
Industrials
SZNE
COWZ
Basic Materials
SZNE
COWZ
Communication Services
SZNE
COWZ
Energy
SZNE
COWZ
Utilities
SZNE
COWZ
-
Consumer Defensive
SZNE
-
COWZ
Financial Services
SZNE
-
COWZ
-
Healthcare
SZNE
-
COWZ
Real Estate
SZNE
-
COWZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZNE vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
SZNE
COWZ
SZNE vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SZNE | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.36 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 4.46 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | 12.19 | -7.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SZNE | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 2.02 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.60 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.65 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
SZNE vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZNE drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, roughly equal to the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZNE and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZNE | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -38.63% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -5.00% | -4.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -22.00% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | -22.00% | -0.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -0.91% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -4.81% | -2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 1.83% | +1.21% |
Volatility
SZNE vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.56%. This indicates that SZNE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZNE | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 2.56% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 7.12% | +4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 11.13% | +3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 17.63% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 19.93% | +0.17% |
SZNE vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SZNE vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than COWZ's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.99% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 1.37% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.79% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZNE and COWZ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SZNE has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to COWZ (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZNE dropped -39.79% vs COWZ's -38.63%.
On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.57% vs 1.44% for SZNE. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 1.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.
COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.37% for SZNE.
SZNE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.49% for COWZ.
COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SZNE and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer