PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SZNE vs. BIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SZNE vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SZNE

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

BIBL

1D
0.80%
1M
-2.31%
6M
14.67%
YTD
21.43%
1Y
31.70%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.49M$2.79M$2.92M

SZNE vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
9.68%-3.44%2.05%6.53%-12.33%26.36%4.03%35.75%-7.01%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
21.43%17.27%12.49%17.87%-23.26%27.44%22.62%29.68%-10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and BIBL is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2018

0.80

The correlation between SZNE and BIBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SZNE vs. BIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SZNE
BIBL

Technology

19.4%
33.0%

Financial Services

8.1%
8.3%

Industrials

7.8%
26.8%

Healthcare

5.1%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
0.3%

Energy

3.8%
5.4%

Communication Services

3.7%

-

Real Estate

2.8%
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
0.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.8%

Utilities

1.0%
3.4%

Technology

SZNE
19.4%
BIBL
33.0%

Financial Services

SZNE
8.1%
BIBL
8.3%

Industrials

SZNE
7.8%
BIBL
26.8%

Healthcare

SZNE
5.1%
BIBL
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SZNE
5.1%
BIBL
0.3%

Energy

SZNE
3.8%
BIBL
5.4%

Communication Services

SZNE
3.7%
BIBL

-

Real Estate

SZNE
2.8%
BIBL
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

SZNE
2.6%
BIBL
0.4%

Basic Materials

SZNE
1.8%
BIBL
3.8%

Utilities

SZNE
1.0%
BIBL
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SZNE vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SZNE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BIBL
BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SZNE vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SZNEBIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

SZNE vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SZNE vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SZNEBIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

Volatility

SZNE vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SZNEBIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.10%

SZNE vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SZNE vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than BIBL's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
0.95%1.01%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.49%0.31%
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
1.23%1.47%1.20%1.21%1.11%0.79%1.37%0.90%0.68%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SZNE and BIBL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BIBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BIBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.

SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.95% for BIBL.

SZNE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BIBL is Large Cap Growth Equities. SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while BIBL tracks Inspire 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.35% for BIBL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SZNE and BIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer