SZK vs. TERG
SZK (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SZK is passively managed, while TERG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. SZK charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
SZK vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SZK achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 229.64% return.
SZK
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -8.35%
- 1Y
- 2.69%
- 3Y*
- -4.48%
- 5Y*
- -3.44%
- 10Y*
- -16.12%
TERG
- 1D
- 8.49%
- 1M
- 39.95%
- YTD
- 229.64%
- 6M
- 218.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SZK vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | -10.45% | -2.75% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 229.64% | 28.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZK and TERG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZK vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
SZK
TERG
SZK vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SZK | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.11 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.33 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SZK | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 9.90 | -10.48 |
Drawdowns
SZK vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZK | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -49.52% | -49.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.24% | -15.98% | -83.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.99% | -13.73% | -68.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.87% | — | — |
Volatility
SZK vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZK | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.19% | 139.25% | -114.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.45% | 139.25% | -107.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.60% | 139.25% | -105.65% |
SZK vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SZK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SZK vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | 2.65% | 2.90% | 5.70% | 4.03% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.70% | 0.50% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZK and TERG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SZK.
SZK has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SZK and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for SZK and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer