SZK vs. FDV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SZK (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods) and FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZK is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%), while FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated. SZK is passively managed, while FDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SZK returned -4.29%/yr vs 14.78%/yr for FDV. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. SZK charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FDV.

Performance

SZK vs. FDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SZK achieves a -9.91% return, which is significantly lower than FDV's 11.72% return.

SZK

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 6.20%
• YTD: -9.91%
• 6M: -7.73%
• 1Y: 3.38%
• 3Y*: -4.29%
• 5Y*: -3.68%
• 10Y*: -16.07%

FDV

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.21%
• YTD: 11.72%
• 6M: 12.18%
• 1Y: 20.02%
• 3Y*: 14.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZK vs. FDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods	-9.91%	3.37%	-11.33%	-3.10%	7.99%
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	11.72%	11.01%	14.41%	-2.16%	1.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SZK and FDV is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022	-0.64

The correlation between SZK and FDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.64 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SZK vs. FDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZK

SZK Risk / Return Rank: 10
SZK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
SZK Omega Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Martin Ratio Rank: 10

FDV

FDV Risk / Return Rank: 61
FDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FDV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FDV Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZK vs. FDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SZK	FDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	2.01	-1.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.37	3.02	-2.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.35	-0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.11	3.37	-3.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.26	10.75	-10.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SZK vs. FDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SZK Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the FDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SZK and FDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SZK	FDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13	2.01	-1.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.58	0.82	-1.41

Drawdowns

SZK vs. FDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than FDV's maximum drawdown of -16.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and FDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SZK	FDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.40%	-16.70%	-82.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.26%	-5.70%	-23.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.81%	-12.55%	-29.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.24%	-0.39%	-98.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.99%	-3.93%	-78.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.83%	1.79%	+11.04%

Volatility

SZK vs. FDV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) at 2.82%. This indicates that SZK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SZK	FDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.22%	2.82%	+5.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.99%	6.82%	+13.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.18%	10.74%	+14.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.45%	12.65%	+18.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.61%	12.65%	+20.96%

SZK vs. FDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FDV's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SZK vs. FDV - Dividend Comparison

SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than FDV's 2.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	2.56%	3.11%	3.12%	3.54%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods	2.63%	2.90%	5.70%	4.03%	0.56%	0.00%	0.19%	1.70%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SZK and FDV in my portfolio?

SZK and FDV have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SZK or FDV?

SZK has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to FDV (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZK dropped -99.40% vs FDV's -16.70%.

Which ETF is better, SZK or FDV?

On 3-year performance, FDV leads with 14.78% vs -4.29% for SZK. On fees, FDV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SZK or FDV?

Over the 3-year period, FDV has performed better with a 14.78% return vs -4.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SZK or FDV?

FDV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SZK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SZK or FDV?

SZK has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 2.56% for FDV.

What is the main difference between SZK and FDV?

SZK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Federated. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SZK and 0.50% for FDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.