SZK vs. BITU
SZK (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZK is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%), while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SZK returned 2.69% vs -73.07% for BITU. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SZK vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SZK achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -52.92% return.
SZK
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -8.35%
- 1Y
- 2.69%
- 3Y*
- -4.48%
- 5Y*
- -3.44%
- 10Y*
- -16.12%
BITU
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -34.84%
- YTD
- -52.92%
- 6M
- -59.11%
- 1Y
- -73.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SZK vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | -10.45% | 3.37% | -4.21% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -52.92% | -37.07% | 37.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZK and BITU is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZK vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
SZK
BITU
SZK vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SZK | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.84 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | -0.93 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | -1.47 | +1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SZK | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | -0.84 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | -0.35 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
SZK vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and BITU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZK | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -78.94% | -20.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.26% | -78.94% | +49.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.24% | -78.94% | -20.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.99% | -34.49% | -47.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.87% | 49.84% | -36.97% |
Volatility
SZK vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) is 8.10%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that SZK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZK | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 18.99% | -10.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.99% | 69.41% | -49.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.19% | 87.00% | -61.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.45% | 97.45% | -66.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.60% | 97.45% | -63.85% |
SZK vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SZK and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SZK vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than BITU's 83.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 83.36% | 50.23% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | 2.65% | 2.90% | 5.70% | 4.03% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.70% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZK and BITU have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to SZK (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZK dropped -99.40% vs BITU's -78.94%.
On 1-year performance, SZK leads with 2.69% vs -73.07% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SZK has been the lower-risk option at 8.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SZK has performed better with a 2.69% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SZK and BITU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 2.65% for SZK.
SZK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. SZK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross.
SZK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SZK and BITU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer