SZK vs. ARMG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SZK (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SZK is passively managed, while ARMG is actively managed. Over the past year, SZK returned 2.69% vs 510.84% for ARMG. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SZK charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.

Performance

SZK vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SZK achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 936.32% return.

SZK

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 3.66%
• YTD: -10.45%
• 6M: -8.35%
• 1Y: 2.69%
• 3Y*: -4.48%
• 5Y*: -3.44%
• 10Y*: -16.12%

ARMG

• 1D: 4.85%
• 1M: 261.28%
• YTD: 936.32%
• 6M: 526.62%
• 1Y: 510.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZK vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods	-10.45%	-2.31%
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	936.32%	-61.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SZK and ARMG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025	0.07

Return for Risk

SZK vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZK

SZK Risk / Return Rank: 10
SZK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Omega Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Martin Ratio Rank: 10

ARMG

ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 84
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZK vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SZK	ARMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.11	3.96	-3.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.33	3.63	-3.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.46	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	7.56	-7.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	13.34	-13.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SZK vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SZK Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the ARMG Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SZK and ARMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SZK	ARMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11	3.96	-3.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.59	1.24	-1.83

Drawdowns

SZK vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than ARMG's maximum drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and ARMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SZK	ARMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.40%	-80.28%	-19.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.26%	-68.13%	+38.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.24%	0.00%	-99.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.99%	-53.04%	-28.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.87%	38.55%	-25.68%

Volatility

SZK vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) is 8.10%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a volatility of 64.57%. This indicates that SZK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SZK	ARMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.10%	64.57%	-56.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.99%	103.90%	-83.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.19%	130.31%	-105.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.45%	138.30%	-106.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.60%	138.30%	-104.70%

SZK vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SZK vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than ARMG's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	0.47%	4.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods	2.65%	2.90%	5.70%	4.03%	0.56%	0.00%	0.19%	1.70%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SZK and ARMG in my portfolio?

SZK and ARMG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SZK or ARMG?

ARMG has higher volatility (64.57%) compared to SZK (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZK dropped -99.40% vs ARMG's -80.28%.

Which ETF is better, SZK or ARMG?

On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 510.84% vs 2.69% for SZK. On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SZK has been the lower-risk option at 8.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SZK or ARMG?

Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 510.84% return vs 2.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SZK or ARMG?

ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SZK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SZK or ARMG?

SZK has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.47% for ARMG.

What is the main difference between SZK and ARMG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SZK and 0.75% for ARMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.