SYM vs. FLKR
SYM (Symbotic Inc) is a stock, while FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, SYM returned 36.45%/yr vs 19.48%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SYM vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYM achieves a -20.66% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 114.41% return.
SYM
- 1D
- -3.83%
- 1M
- -17.18%
- YTD
- -20.66%
- 6M
- -35.52%
- 1Y
- 60.14%
- 3Y*
- 12.18%
- 5Y*
- 36.45%
- 10Y*
- —
FLKR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 29.00%
- YTD
- 114.41%
- 6M
- 130.14%
- 1Y
- 238.40%
- 3Y*
- 51.14%
- 5Y*
- 19.48%
- 10Y*
- —
SYM vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYM Symbotic Inc | -20.66% | 150.95% | -53.81% | 329.90% | 19.40% | -2.44% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 114.41% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -8.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYM and FLKR is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYM vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
SYM
FLKR
SYM vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symbotic Inc (SYM) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SYM | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.73 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 10.42 | -9.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | 38.67 | -36.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SYM | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 5.83 | -5.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.69 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.55 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
SYM vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYM drawdown since its inception was -72.46%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYM and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYM | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.46% | -50.06% | -22.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.82% | -23.03% | -23.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.46% | -26.39% | -46.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.46% | -49.51% | -22.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.92% | -1.77% | -44.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.01% | -22.07% | -5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.27% | 6.20% | +21.07% |
Volatility
SYM vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
Symbotic Inc (SYM) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) have volatilities of 21.13% and 20.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYM | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.13% | 20.21% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.24% | 36.52% | +17.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.43% | 41.18% | +49.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 104.08% | 28.19% | +75.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.73% | 27.56% | +74.17% |
Dividends
SYM vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
SYM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.80% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
SYM Symbotic Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYM and FLKR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SYM has higher volatility (21.13%) compared to FLKR (20.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYM dropped -72.46% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SYM and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer