SYLD vs. GMOM
SYLD (Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF) and GMOM (Cambria Global Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SYLD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while GMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SYLD returned 13.04%/yr vs 7.75%/yr for GMOM. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for GMOM.
Performance
SYLD vs. GMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYLD achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than GMOM's 12.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SYLD has outperformed GMOM with an annualized return of 13.04%, while GMOM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.75% annualized return.
SYLD
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
GMOM
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 14.74%
- 1Y
- 30.49%
- 3Y*
- 13.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 7.75%
SYLD vs. GMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 14.24% | 3.94% | 3.37% | 16.46% | -6.14% | 48.59% | 13.61% | 26.98% | -13.51% | 20.03% |
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 12.20% | 20.63% | 6.75% | 0.65% | -2.82% | 19.13% | 2.42% | 8.24% | -9.61% | 20.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYLD and GMOM is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2014 | 0.55 |
The correlation between SYLD and GMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SYLD vs. GMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SYLD
GMOM
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Technology
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
SYLD
GMOM
Financial Services
SYLD
GMOM
Energy
SYLD
GMOM
Industrials
SYLD
GMOM
Basic Materials
SYLD
GMOM
Consumer Defensive
SYLD
GMOM
Communication Services
SYLD
GMOM
Healthcare
SYLD
GMOM
Technology
SYLD
GMOM
Real Estate
SYLD
-
GMOM
Utilities
SYLD
-
GMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYLD vs. GMOM — Risk / Return Rank
SYLD
GMOM
SYLD vs. GMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SYLD | GMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 2.25 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.74 | 2.97 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 3.27 | +0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.87 | 12.86 | -1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SYLD | GMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 2.25 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.50 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.61 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.50 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
SYLD vs. GMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYLD drawdown since its inception was -45.36%, which is greater than GMOM's maximum drawdown of -25.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYLD and GMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYLD | GMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.36% | -25.03% | -20.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -9.57% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.62% | -13.73% | -12.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.62% | -19.16% | -7.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.36% | -25.03% | -20.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -1.52% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.66% | -7.82% | +2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.44% | +0.11% |
Volatility
SYLD vs. GMOM - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) have volatilities of 3.24% and 3.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYLD | GMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 3.26% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 11.17% | -1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 13.61% | +1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 14.41% | +6.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 12.83% | +10.13% |
SYLD vs. GMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOM's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
SYLD vs. GMOM - Dividend Comparison
SYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than GMOM's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 1.57% | 3.01% | 2.16% | 3.63% | 2.52% | 3.42% | 1.24% | 2.60% | 1.90% | 2.05% | 1.77% | 1.88% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.86% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 1.92% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.52% | 1.57% | 1.92% | 6.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYLD and GMOM have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMOM has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to SYLD (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYLD dropped -45.36% vs GMOM's -25.03%.
On 10-year performance, SYLD leads with 13.04% vs 7.75% for GMOM. On fees, SYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 7.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GMOM.
SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.57% for GMOM.
SYLD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while GMOM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SYLD and 0.96% for GMOM.
GMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SYLD and GMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer