SYLD vs. EQRR
SYLD (Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF) and EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. SYLD is actively managed, while EQRR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SYLD returned 5.90%/yr vs 12.35%/yr for EQRR. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQRR.
Performance
SYLD vs. EQRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYLD achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly lower than EQRR's 28.07% return.
SYLD
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
EQRR
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- 9.12%
- YTD
- 28.07%
- 6M
- 29.12%
- 1Y
- 44.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- —
SYLD vs. EQRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 14.24% | 3.94% | 3.37% | 16.46% | -6.14% | 48.59% | 13.61% | 26.98% | -13.51% | 11.12% |
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 28.07% | 15.49% | 7.69% | 9.19% | 2.20% | 36.11% | -10.14% | 19.57% | -18.60% | 15.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYLD and EQRR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SYLD and EQRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SYLD vs. EQRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SYLD
EQRR
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
SYLD
EQRR
Financial Services
SYLD
EQRR
Energy
SYLD
EQRR
Industrials
SYLD
EQRR
Basic Materials
SYLD
EQRR
-
Consumer Defensive
SYLD
EQRR
-
Communication Services
SYLD
EQRR
Healthcare
SYLD
EQRR
-
Technology
SYLD
EQRR
Real Estate
SYLD
-
EQRR
-
Utilities
SYLD
-
EQRR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYLD vs. EQRR — Risk / Return Rank
SYLD
EQRR
SYLD vs. EQRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SYLD | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 3.29 | -1.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.74 | 4.30 | -1.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.59 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 9.04 | -5.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.87 | 33.66 | -22.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SYLD | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 3.29 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.58 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.43 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
SYLD vs. EQRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYLD drawdown since its inception was -45.36%, smaller than the maximum EQRR drawdown of -57.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYLD and EQRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYLD | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.36% | -57.93% | +12.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -4.95% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.62% | -17.75% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.62% | -21.75% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | 0.00% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.66% | -10.08% | +4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 1.33% | +1.22% |
Volatility
SYLD vs. EQRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) is 3.24%, while ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that SYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYLD | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 4.61% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 10.32% | -0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 13.49% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 21.38% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 24.87% | -1.91% |
SYLD vs. EQRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EQRR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SYLD vs. EQRR - Dividend Comparison
SYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than EQRR's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.20% | 1.70% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.86% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 1.92% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.52% | 1.57% | 1.92% | 6.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYLD and EQRR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQRR has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to SYLD (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYLD dropped -45.36% vs EQRR's -57.93%.
On 5-year performance, EQRR leads with 12.35% vs 5.90% for SYLD. On fees, EQRR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EQRR has performed better with a 12.35% return vs 5.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQRR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SYLD.
SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.20% for EQRR.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SYLD and 0.35% for EQRR.
EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SYLD and EQRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer