PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXT vs. FIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SXT vs. FIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sensient Technologies Corporation (SXT) and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXT achieves a 21.08% return, which is significantly higher than FIS's -37.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SXT has outperformed FIS with an annualized return of 7.22%, while FIS has yielded a comparatively lower -4.22% annualized return.


SXT

1D
-0.43%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
21.08%
6M
22.82%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
15.94%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
7.22%

FIS

1D
-3.90%
1M
-13.58%
YTD
-37.99%
6M
-36.85%
1Y
-47.70%
3Y*
-7.28%
5Y*
-20.74%
10Y*
-4.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXT vs. FIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXT
Sensient Technologies Corporation
21.08%34.22%10.49%-7.24%-25.61%38.25%14.86%21.00%-22.13%-5.40%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
-37.99%-15.85%36.96%-8.21%-36.46%-21.90%2.71%37.19%10.32%26.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SXT and FIS is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2001

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between SXT and FIS has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SXT:

$4.82B

FIS:

$21.12B

EPS

SXT:

$3.38

FIS:

$5.12

PE Ratio

SXT:

33.37

FIS:

7.98

PEG Ratio

SXT:

5.14

FIS:

0.19

PS Ratio

SXT:

2.91

FIS:

1.83

PB Ratio

SXT:

2.11

FIS:

1.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

SXT:

$1.66B

FIS:

$11.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SXT:

$407.52M

FIS:

$4.38B

EBITDA (TTM)

SXT:

$266.35M

FIS:

$3.25B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXT vs. FIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXT
SXT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXT Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FIS
FIS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXT vs. FIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensient Technologies Corporation (SXT) and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXTFISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.69

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

-0.97

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.30

-1.71

+3.01

SXT vs. FIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the FIS Sharpe Ratio of -1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXT and FIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXTFISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

-1.60

+2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

-0.62

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

-0.14

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.21

+0.19

Drawdowns

SXT vs. FIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXT drawdown since its inception was -50.61%, smaller than the maximum FIS drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXT and FIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXTFISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.61%

-70.50%

+19.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.70%

-49.36%

+18.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.60%

-53.46%

+21.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.61%

-69.64%

+22.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.61%

-70.50%

+19.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.13%

-70.50%

+61.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.96%

-19.67%

+6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.13%

27.87%

-10.74%

Volatility

SXT vs. FIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sensient Technologies Corporation (SXT) is 6.62%, while Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) has a volatility of 12.27%. This indicates that SXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXTFISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

12.27%

-5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.72%

24.31%

+6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.62%

29.95%

+7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.49%

33.42%

-3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.31%

29.90%

-1.59%

Dividends

SXT vs. FIS - Dividend Comparison

SXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than FIS's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
4.01%2.41%1.78%3.46%2.77%1.43%0.99%1.01%1.25%1.23%1.37%1.72%
SXT
Sensient Technologies Corporation
1.45%1.75%2.30%2.48%2.25%1.58%2.11%2.22%2.42%1.68%1.41%1.66%

Financials

SXT vs. FIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sensient Technologies Corporation and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
435.83M
3.30B
(SXT) Total Revenue
(FIS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SXT vs. FIS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sensient Technologies Corporation and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%202220232024202520260
33.6%
Portfolio components
SXT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sensient Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 435.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 3.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.6%.

SXT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sensient Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 66.73M and revenue of 435.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

FIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 423.00M and revenue of 3.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.

SXT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sensient Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 44.17M and revenue of 435.83M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.

FIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. reported a net income of 2.37B and revenue of 3.30B, resulting in a net margin of 71.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SXT and FIS have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIS has higher volatility (12.27%) compared to SXT (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SXT dropped -50.61% vs FIS's -70.50%.

SXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXT and FIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer