FIS vs. SMH
FIS (Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, FIS returned -4.26%/yr vs 37.85%/yr for SMH. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FIS vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIS achieves a -41.63% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FIS has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of -4.26%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.85% annualized return.
FIS
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -11.70%
- YTD
- -41.63%
- 6M
- -41.92%
- 1Y
- -51.23%
- 3Y*
- -7.94%
- 5Y*
- -21.62%
- 10Y*
- -4.26%
SMH
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 72.73%
- 6M
- 71.29%
- 1Y
- 138.23%
- 3Y*
- 62.28%
- 5Y*
- 38.18%
- 10Y*
- 37.85%
FIS vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | -41.63% | -15.85% | 36.96% | -8.21% | -36.46% | -21.90% | 2.71% | 37.19% | 10.32% | 26.04% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.73% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIS and SMH is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2001 | 0.41 |
The correlation between FIS and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIS vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
FIS
SMH
FIS vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.67 | 1.58 | -0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 9.31 | -10.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.70 | 33.88 | -35.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIS vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIS drawdown since its inception was -72.46%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIS and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.46% | -84.96% | +12.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.71% | -14.93% | -37.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.55% | -35.74% | -20.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.65% | -45.30% | -26.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.46% | -45.30% | -27.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.23% | -7.01% | -65.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.78% | -41.01% | +21.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.19% | 4.10% | +26.09% |
Volatility
FIS vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is 8.58%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that FIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 19.08% | -10.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.73% | 29.18% | -4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.36% | 34.87% | -4.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.51% | 35.83% | -2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 32.97% | -3.04% |
Dividends
FIS vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
FIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 4.42% | 2.41% | 1.78% | 3.46% | 2.77% | 1.43% | 0.99% | 1.01% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.72% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIS and SMH have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to FIS (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIS dropped -72.46% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs -1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIS and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer