FIS vs. SMH
FIS (Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, FIS returned -4.09%/yr vs 35.93%/yr for SMH. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FIS vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIS achieves a -35.64% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 62.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FIS has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of -4.09%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 35.93% annualized return.
FIS
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 6.96%
- 6M
- -35.43%
- YTD
- -35.64%
- 1Y
- -44.96%
- 3Y*
- -8.46%
- 5Y*
- -20.32%
- 10Y*
- -4.09%
SMH
- 1D
- -4.16%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- 6M
- 49.91%
- YTD
- 62.61%
- 1Y
- 104.33%
- 3Y*
- 55.82%
- 5Y*
- 36.02%
- 10Y*
- 35.93%
FIS vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | -35.64% | -15.85% | 36.96% | -8.21% | -36.46% | -21.90% | 2.71% | 37.19% | 10.32% | 26.04% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 62.61% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIS and SMH is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2001 | 0.41 |
The correlation between FIS and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIS vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
FIS
SMH
FIS vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 1.43 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 7.03 | -7.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 22.83 | -24.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIS vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIS drawdown since its inception was -72.46%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIS and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.46% | -84.96% | +12.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.48% | -14.93% | -37.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.55% | -35.74% | -20.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.65% | -45.30% | -26.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.46% | -45.30% | -27.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.38% | -12.45% | -56.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -40.94% | +21.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.91% | 4.59% | +27.32% |
Volatility
FIS vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is 9.52%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 18.45%. This indicates that FIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | 18.45% | -8.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.12% | 31.29% | -5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.41% | 36.76% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.69% | 36.19% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.99% | 33.14% | -3.15% |
Dividends
FIS vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
FIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 4.01% | 2.41% | 1.78% | 3.46% | 2.77% | 1.43% | 0.99% | 1.01% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.72% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIS and SMH have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (18.45%) compared to FIS (9.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIS dropped -72.46% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs -1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIS and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer