FIS vs. GPN
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) and Global Payments Inc. (GPN).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FIS or GPN.
Correlation
The correlation between FIS and GPN is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FIS vs. GPN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FIS:
-0.08
GPN:
-1.03
FIS:
0.05
GPN:
-1.38
FIS:
1.01
GPN:
0.81
FIS:
-0.04
GPN:
-0.54
FIS:
-0.20
GPN:
-1.83
FIS:
9.57%
GPN:
17.81%
FIS:
24.04%
GPN:
31.48%
FIS:
-67.65%
GPN:
-59.97%
FIS:
-50.45%
GPN:
-59.97%
Fundamentals
FIS:
$37.03B
GPN:
$20.87B
FIS:
$1.42
GPN:
$6.16
FIS:
49.23
GPN:
13.78
FIS:
0.66
GPN:
0.57
FIS:
$7.66B
GPN:
$7.69B
FIS:
$2.91B
GPN:
$4.85B
FIS:
$2.78B
GPN:
$3.51B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIS achieves a -12.97% return, which is significantly higher than GPN's -24.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FIS has underperformed GPN with an annualized return of 2.03%, while GPN has yielded a comparatively higher 6.04% annualized return.
FIS
-12.97%
-1.37%
-16.59%
-1.67%
-8.33%
2.03%
GPN
-24.05%
-15.54%
-13.54%
-31.93%
-9.01%
6.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FIS vs. GPN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FIS
GPN
FIS vs. GPN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) and Global Payments Inc. (GPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FIS vs. GPN - Dividend Comparison
FIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than GPN's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 2.12% | 1.78% | 4.33% | 2.77% | 1.43% | 0.99% | 1.01% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.72% | 1.54% |
GPN Global Payments Inc. | 1.18% | 0.89% | 0.79% | 1.01% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 0.12% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.10% |
Drawdowns
FIS vs. GPN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIS drawdown since its inception was -67.65%, which is greater than GPN's maximum drawdown of -59.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIS and GPN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FIS vs. GPN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is 9.67%, while Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a volatility of 13.54%. This indicates that FIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FIS vs. GPN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Global Payments Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities