PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXT vs. SENEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

SXT vs. SENEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sensient Technologies Corporation (SXT) and Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SXT vs. SENEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXT
Sensient Technologies Corporation
-7.59%34.22%10.49%-7.24%-25.61%38.25%14.86%21.00%-22.13%-5.40%
SENEB
Seneca Foods Corporation
35.11%37.97%53.72%-14.65%28.51%19.24%-3.66%39.12%-13.32%-19.05%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SXT:

$3.69B

SENEB:

$1.02B

EPS

SXT:

$3.16

SENEB:

$12.99

PE Ratio

SXT:

27.39

SENEB:

11.39

PEG Ratio

SXT:

4.22

SENEB:

0.10

PS Ratio

SXT:

2.29

SENEB:

0.64

PB Ratio

SXT:

1.64

SENEB:

1.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

SXT:

$1.61B

SENEB:

$1.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SXT:

$415.95M

SENEB:

$202.67M

EBITDA (TTM)

SXT:

$253.02M

SENEB:

$170.76M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXT achieves a -7.59% return, which is significantly lower than SENEB's 35.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SXT has underperformed SENEB with an annualized return of 5.25%, while SENEB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.49% annualized return.


SXT

1D
-0.86%
1M
-14.86%
YTD
-7.59%
6M
-7.09%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*
5.25%

SENEB

1D
0.00%
1M
6.69%
YTD
35.11%
6M
41.66%
1Y
63.03%
3Y*
39.95%
5Y*
25.14%
10Y*
14.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Sensient Technologies Corporation

Seneca Foods Corporation

Often compared with SXT:
SXT vs. PSISXT vs. CHTRSXT vs. NBIS
Often compared with SENEB:
SENEB vs. SENEA

Return for Risk

SXT vs. SENEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXT
SXT Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXT Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXT Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SENEB
SENEB Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SENEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SENEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SENEB Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SENEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SENEB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXT vs. SENEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensient Technologies Corporation (SXT) and Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXTSENEBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.58

2.37

-1.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.11

3.34

-2.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.91

-0.78

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

4.82

-4.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.20

13.18

-11.98

SXT vs. SENEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the SENEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXT and SENEB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXTSENEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

2.37

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.72

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.36

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.20

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between SXT and SENEB is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SXT vs. SENEB - Dividend Comparison

SXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, while SENEB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SXT
Sensient Technologies Corporation
1.90%1.75%2.30%2.48%2.25%1.58%2.11%2.22%2.42%1.68%1.41%1.66%
SENEB
Seneca Foods Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SXT vs. SENEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXT drawdown since its inception was -50.61%, smaller than the maximum SENEB drawdown of -53.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXT and SENEB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SXTSENEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.61%

-53.42%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.70%

-13.01%

-17.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.61%

-53.42%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.61%

-53.42%

+2.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.80%

0.00%

-27.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.96%

-22.09%

+9.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.15%

4.76%

+11.39%

Volatility

SXT vs. SENEB - Volatility Comparison

Sensient Technologies Corporation (SXT) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB) at 4.84%. This indicates that SXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SXTSENEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.17%

4.84%

+3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.15%

22.16%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.44%

26.74%

+4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.96%

35.28%

-8.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.99%

40.72%

-13.73%

Financials

SXT vs. SENEB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sensient Technologies Corporation and Seneca Foods Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M450.00M500.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
393.45M
508.35M
(SXT) Total Revenue
(SENEB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SXT vs. SENEB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sensient Technologies Corporation and Seneca Foods Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober0
16.4%
Portfolio components
SXT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sensient Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 393.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SENEB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 83.46M and revenue of 508.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.

SXT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sensient Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 38.19M and revenue of 393.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

SENEB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 59.97M and revenue of 508.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

SXT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sensient Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 25.48M and revenue of 393.45M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

SENEB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a net income of 44.77M and revenue of 508.35M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.