SXT vs. SENEB
SXT (Sensient Technologies Corporation) and SENEB (Seneca Foods Corporation) are both stocks. SXT operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while SENEB operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, SXT returned 7.66%/yr vs 15.71%/yr for SENEB. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SXT vs. SENEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXT achieves a 27.38% return, which is significantly lower than SENEB's 44.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SXT has underperformed SENEB with an annualized return of 7.66%, while SENEB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.71% annualized return.
SXT
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 27.38%
- 6M
- 24.19%
- 1Y
- 22.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
SENEB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 11.24%
- YTD
- 44.67%
- 6M
- 38.43%
- 1Y
- 71.61%
- 3Y*
- 54.46%
- 5Y*
- 25.56%
- 10Y*
- 15.71%
SXT vs. SENEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXT Sensient Technologies Corporation | 27.38% | 34.22% | 10.49% | -7.24% | -25.61% | 38.25% | 14.86% | 21.00% | -22.13% | -5.40% |
SENEB Seneca Foods Corporation | 44.67% | 37.97% | 53.72% | -14.65% | 28.51% | 19.24% | -3.66% | 39.12% | -13.32% | -19.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXT and SENEB is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
SXT:
$5.07B
SENEB:
$1.08B
SXT:
$3.38
SENEB:
$16.62
SXT:
35.11
SENEB:
9.54
SXT:
5.40
SENEB:
0.05
SXT:
3.06
SENEB:
0.66
SXT:
2.21
SENEB:
1.43
SXT:
$1.66B
SENEB:
$1.66B
SXT:
$407.52M
SENEB:
$231.21M
SXT:
$266.35M
SENEB:
$199.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXT vs. SENEB — Risk / Return Rank
SXT
SENEB
SXT vs. SENEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensient Technologies Corporation (SXT) and Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SXT | SENEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.78 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 3.54 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | 9.52 | -8.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SXT vs. SENEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXT drawdown since its inception was -50.61%, smaller than the maximum SENEB drawdown of -53.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXT and SENEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXT | SENEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.61% | -53.42% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.70% | -20.32% | -10.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.70% | -24.37% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.61% | -53.42% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.61% | -53.42% | +2.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.40% | -6.30% | +1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.95% | -22.02% | +9.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.20% | 7.54% | +9.66% |
Volatility
SXT vs. SENEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sensient Technologies Corporation (SXT) is 13.44%, while Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB) has a volatility of 16.08%. This indicates that SXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SENEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXT | SENEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.44% | 16.08% | -2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.40% | 29.84% | +2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.44% | 36.22% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 36.60% | -6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.56% | 40.15% | -11.59% |
Dividends
SXT vs. SENEB - Dividend Comparison
SXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while SENEB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SENEB Seneca Foods Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SXT Sensient Technologies Corporation | 1.38% | 1.75% | 2.30% | 2.48% | 2.25% | 1.58% | 2.11% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.66% |
Financials
SXT vs. SENEB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sensient Technologies Corporation and Seneca Foods Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SXT vs. SENEB - Profitability Comparison
SXT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sensient Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 435.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SENEB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 44.08M and revenue of 393.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.2%.
SXT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sensient Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 66.73M and revenue of 435.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.
SENEB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 23.74M and revenue of 393.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.
SXT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sensient Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 44.17M and revenue of 435.83M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.
SENEB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a net income of 25.28M and revenue of 393.85M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SXT and SENEB have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SENEB has higher volatility (16.08%) compared to SXT (13.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SXT dropped -50.61% vs SENEB's -53.42%.
SENEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SXT and SENEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer