PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIS vs. ALGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FIS vs. ALGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) and Align Technology, Inc. (ALGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIS achieves a -42.10% return, which is significantly lower than ALGN's 11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FIS has underperformed ALGN with an annualized return of -4.34%, while ALGN has yielded a comparatively higher 8.20% annualized return.


FIS

1D
-1.28%
1M
-12.42%
YTD
-42.10%
6M
-42.47%
1Y
-51.43%
3Y*
-8.19%
5Y*
-21.70%
10Y*
-4.34%

ALGN

1D
-4.57%
1M
6.20%
YTD
11.28%
6M
9.09%
1Y
-4.42%
3Y*
-19.15%
5Y*
-22.10%
10Y*
8.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIS vs. ALGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
-42.10%-15.85%36.96%-8.21%-36.46%-21.90%2.71%37.19%10.32%26.04%
ALGN
Align Technology, Inc.
11.28%-25.11%-23.90%29.92%-67.91%22.98%91.51%33.24%-5.74%131.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FIS and ALGN is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2001

0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FIS:

$19.50B

ALGN:

$12.44B

EPS

FIS:

$5.12

ALGN:

$5.96

PE Ratio

FIS:

7.36

ALGN:

29.14

PS Ratio

FIS:

1.69

ALGN:

3.06

PB Ratio

FIS:

1.22

ALGN:

3.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

FIS:

$11.66B

ALGN:

$4.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FIS:

$4.38B

ALGN:

$2.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

FIS:

$3.25B

ALGN:

$776.15M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIS vs. ALGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIS
FIS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIS Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ALGN
ALGN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ALGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALGN Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
ALGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALGN Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIS vs. ALGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) and Align Technology, Inc. (ALGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FISALGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.67

1.05

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

-0.11

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.72

-0.18

-1.53

FIS vs. ALGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIS Sharpe Ratio is -1.70, which is lower than the ALGN Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIS and ALGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIS vs. ALGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIS drawdown since its inception was -72.46%, smaller than the maximum ALGN drawdown of -92.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIS and ALGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FISALGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.46%

-92.83%

+20.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.71%

-39.73%

-12.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.55%

-67.59%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.65%

-82.89%

+11.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.46%

-82.89%

+10.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.46%

-76.19%

+3.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

-37.99%

+18.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.01%

24.05%

+5.96%

Volatility

FIS vs. ALGN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is 8.91%, while Align Technology, Inc. (ALGN) has a volatility of 13.98%. This indicates that FIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FISALGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.91%

13.98%

-5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.69%

29.95%

-5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.40%

53.25%

-22.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.51%

49.72%

-16.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.97%

49.17%

-19.20%

Dividends

FIS vs. ALGN - Dividend Comparison

FIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, while ALGN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALGN
Align Technology, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
4.45%2.41%1.78%3.46%2.77%1.43%0.99%1.01%1.25%1.23%1.37%1.72%

Financials

FIS vs. ALGN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Align Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
3.30B
1.04B
(FIS) Total Revenue
(ALGN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FIS vs. ALGN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Align Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
33.6%
70.8%
Portfolio components
FIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 3.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.6%.

ALGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Align Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 736.59M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.8%.

FIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 423.00M and revenue of 3.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.

ALGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Align Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 141.96M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

FIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. reported a net income of 2.37B and revenue of 3.30B, resulting in a net margin of 71.8%.

ALGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Align Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 112.77M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FIS and ALGN have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALGN has higher volatility (13.98%) compared to FIS (8.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIS dropped -72.46% vs ALGN's -92.83%.

ALGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIS and ALGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer