SWYMX vs. SWLGX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SWYMX (Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund) and SWLGX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SWYMX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SWLGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Over the past 5 years, SWYMX returned 9.96%/yr vs 15.93%/yr for SWLGX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWYMX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWLGX.

Performance

SWYMX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWYMX achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's 9.01% return.

SWYMX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 4.06%
• YTD: 11.75%
• 6M: 12.78%
• 1Y: 26.98%
• 3Y*: 19.02%
• 5Y*: 9.96%
• 10Y*: —

SWLGX

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 7.30%
• YTD: 9.01%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 28.78%
• 3Y*: 25.70%
• 5Y*: 15.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWYMX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWYMX Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund	11.75%	19.42%	14.24%	20.92%	-17.65%	17.80%	14.66%	25.34%	-7.58%	0.42%
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	9.01%	18.55%	33.30%	42.67%	-29.17%	27.55%	38.43%	36.30%	-1.59%	-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SWYMX and SWLGX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017	0.88

The correlation between SWYMX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWYMX vs. SWLGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SWYMX	SWLGX
Technology	26.9%	51.4%
Financial Services	15.2%	5.4%
Industrials	11.3%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	13.2%
Healthcare	7.8%	7.1%
Communication Services	7.6%	13.2%
Real Estate	7.4%	0.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	2.7%
Energy	4.0%	0.4%
Basic Materials	3.7%	0.3%
Utilities	2.5%	0.3%

Return for Risk

SWYMX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWYMX

SWYMX Risk / Return Rank: 70
SWYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SWYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SWYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SWYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
SWYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

SWLGX

SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWYMX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWYMX	SWLGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	1.93	+0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	2.60	+0.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.33	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	1.83	+1.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.41	6.16	+8.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWYMX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWYMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWYMX and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWYMX	SWLGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	1.93	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.74	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.80	-0.06

Drawdowns

SWYMX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWYMX drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, smaller than the maximum SWLGX drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYMX and SWLGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWYMX	SWLGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.48%	-32.69%	+2.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.55%	-16.16%	+7.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.95%	-23.30%	+8.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.37%	-32.69%	+7.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.51%	-7.06%	+2.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	4.80%	-2.89%

Volatility

SWYMX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) have volatilities of 3.38% and 3.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWYMX	SWLGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	3.23%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.94%	11.59%	-2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.28%	15.43%	-4.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.72%	21.49%	-6.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.63%	22.68%	-7.05%

SWYMX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWYMX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWYMX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

SWYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than SWLGX's 0.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	0.42%	0.46%	0.52%	0.67%	0.93%	1.76%	0.67%	0.96%	1.03%	0.00%	0.00%
SWYMX Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund	1.79%	2.00%	2.03%	1.99%	1.96%	1.78%	1.65%	1.96%	2.15%	1.43%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWYMX and SWLGX in my portfolio?

SWYMX and SWLGX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWYMX or SWLGX?

SWYMX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to SWLGX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYMX dropped -30.48% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SWYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.