SWYMX vs. SFLNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX).
SWYMX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Aug 24, 2016. SFLNX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI US Large Company Index. It was launched on Apr 2, 2007.
Performance
SWYMX vs. SFLNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWYMX vs. SFLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWYMX Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund | -3.72% | 19.42% | 14.24% | 20.92% | -17.65% | 17.80% | 14.66% | 25.34% | -7.58% | 20.48% |
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund | 0.72% | 17.02% | 16.78% | 18.16% | -6.89% | 31.64% | 9.12% | 28.91% | -7.43% | 17.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWYMX achieves a -3.72% return, which is significantly lower than SFLNX's 0.72% return.
SWYMX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -7.99%
- YTD
- -3.72%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.23%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
SFLNX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 17.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWYMX vs. SFLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWYMX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLNX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SWYMX vs. SFLNX — Risk / Return Rank
SWYMX
SFLNX
SWYMX vs. SFLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWYMX | SFLNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 1.17 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 1.69 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 1.37 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.28 | 6.61 | -0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWYMX | SFLNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 1.17 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.77 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.50 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWYMX and SFLNX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWYMX vs. SFLNX - Dividend Comparison
SWYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than SFLNX's 1.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWYMX Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.03% | 1.99% | 1.96% | 1.78% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 2.15% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 0.00% |
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund | 1.66% | 1.68% | 1.78% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 4.78% | 6.17% | 5.33% | 9.69% | 3.28% | 7.23% | 5.68% |
Drawdowns
SWYMX vs. SFLNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWYMX drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, smaller than the maximum SFLNX drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYMX and SFLNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWYMX | SFLNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.48% | -56.18% | +25.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -12.28% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.37% | -18.98% | -6.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.55% | -6.10% | -2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.57% | -6.06% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 2.55% | -0.27% |
Volatility
SWYMX vs. SFLNX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) at 3.33%. This indicates that SWYMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWYMX | SFLNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 3.33% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.40% | 7.95% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 16.16% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 15.32% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 18.40% | -2.74% |