PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWYMX vs. DRILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWYMX vs. DRILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SWYMX having a 11.75% return and DRILX slightly higher at 12.00%.


SWYMX

1D
0.21%
1M
4.06%
YTD
11.75%
6M
12.78%
1Y
26.98%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*

DRILX

1D
0.27%
1M
4.20%
YTD
12.00%
6M
13.17%
1Y
28.13%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
12.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWYMX vs. DRILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWYMX
Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund
11.75%19.42%14.24%20.92%-17.65%17.80%14.66%25.34%-7.58%20.48%
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
12.00%19.66%17.10%21.37%-15.28%21.08%14.10%25.61%-9.07%21.51%

Correlation

The correlation between SWYMX and DRILX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2016

0.96

The correlation between SWYMX and DRILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWYMX vs. DRILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWYMX
SWYMX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SWYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DRILX
DRILX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DRILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DRILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRILX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWYMX vs. DRILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWYMXDRILXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.88

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.43

4.03

-0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.52

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

4.28

-1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.41

19.49

-5.08

SWYMX vs. DRILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWYMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the DRILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWYMX and DRILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWYMXDRILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.88

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.80

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.81

-0.07

Drawdowns

SWYMX vs. DRILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWYMX drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, smaller than the maximum DRILX drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYMX and DRILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWYMXDRILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.48%

-33.48%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-8.58%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-15.76%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-23.50%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-4.24%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.88%

+0.03%

Volatility

SWYMX vs. DRILX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX) at 3.12%. This indicates that SWYMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWYMXDRILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

3.12%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

8.74%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.28%

11.09%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.72%

14.84%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

15.75%

-0.12%

SWYMX vs. DRILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWYMX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DRILX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWYMX vs. DRILX - Dividend Comparison

SWYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than DRILX's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.34%1.47%2.40%3.26%3.97%2.25%2.11%2.12%2.25%0.91%1.96%
SWYMX
Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund
1.79%2.00%2.03%1.99%1.96%1.78%1.65%1.96%2.15%1.43%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWYMX and DRILX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWYMX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to DRILX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYMX dropped -30.48% vs DRILX's -33.48%.

DRILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWYMX and DRILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer