PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRILX vs. SWTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRILX vs. SWTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX) and Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DRILX having a 12.00% return and SWTSX slightly lower at 11.78%. Over the past 10 years, DRILX has underperformed SWTSX with an annualized return of 12.66%, while SWTSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.


DRILX

1D
0.27%
1M
4.20%
YTD
12.00%
6M
13.17%
1Y
28.13%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
12.66%

SWTSX

1D
0.27%
1M
5.17%
YTD
11.78%
6M
12.17%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
22.27%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRILX vs. SWTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
12.00%19.66%17.10%21.37%-15.28%21.08%14.10%25.61%-9.07%21.51%
SWTSX
Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund
11.78%17.04%23.84%26.05%-19.54%25.65%20.71%30.90%-5.35%21.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DRILX and SWTSX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.95

The correlation between DRILX and SWTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRILX vs. SWTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRILX
DRILX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DRILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DRILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRILX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SWTSX
SWTSX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SWTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SWTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRILX vs. SWTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX) and Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRILXSWTSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.88

2.47

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.03

3.35

+0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.44

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

3.39

+0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.49

15.57

+3.92

DRILX vs. SWTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRILX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the SWTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRILX and SWTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRILXSWTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

2.47

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.74

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.81

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.44

+0.38

Drawdowns

DRILX vs. SWTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRILX drawdown since its inception was -33.48%, smaller than the maximum SWTSX drawdown of -54.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRILX and SWTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRILXSWTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.48%

-54.60%

+21.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.58%

-8.88%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.76%

-19.43%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.50%

-25.40%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.48%

-35.01%

+1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-10.57%

+6.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.93%

-0.05%

Volatility

DRILX vs. SWTSX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX) at 2.96%. This indicates that DRILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRILXSWTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

2.96%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

9.22%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.09%

12.28%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

17.44%

-2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

18.61%

-2.86%

DRILX vs. SWTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRILX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SWTSX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DRILX vs. SWTSX - Dividend Comparison

DRILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than SWTSX's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.34%1.47%2.40%3.26%3.97%2.25%2.11%2.12%2.25%0.91%1.96%0.00%
SWTSX
Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund
0.99%1.10%1.24%1.41%1.62%1.46%1.63%1.92%2.58%1.83%2.32%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRILX and SWTSX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRILX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to SWTSX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRILX dropped -33.48% vs SWTSX's -54.60%.

DRILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRILX and SWTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer