PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRILX vs. DFSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRILX vs. DFSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio (DFSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRILX achieves a 12.00% return, which is significantly lower than DFSTX's 13.83% return. Over the past 10 years, DRILX has outperformed DFSTX with an annualized return of 12.66%, while DFSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.85% annualized return.


DRILX

1D
0.27%
1M
4.20%
YTD
12.00%
6M
13.17%
1Y
28.13%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
12.66%

DFSTX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.80%
YTD
13.83%
6M
14.64%
1Y
30.03%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRILX vs. DFSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
12.00%19.66%17.10%21.37%-15.28%21.08%14.10%25.61%-9.07%21.51%
DFSTX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio
13.83%8.07%11.50%17.66%-13.50%30.50%11.19%21.78%-13.20%11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between DRILX and DFSTX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.84

The correlation between DRILX and DFSTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRILX vs. DFSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRILX
DRILX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DRILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DRILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRILX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSTX
DFSTX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DFSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRILX vs. DFSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio (DFSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRILXDFSTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.88

1.79

+1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.03

2.63

+1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.31

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

3.24

+1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.49

11.01

+8.48

DRILX vs. DFSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRILX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is higher than the DFSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRILX and DFSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRILXDFSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

1.79

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.39

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.49

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.50

+0.31

Drawdowns

DRILX vs. DFSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRILX drawdown since its inception was -33.48%, smaller than the maximum DFSTX drawdown of -60.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRILX and DFSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRILXDFSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.48%

-60.99%

+27.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.58%

-9.16%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.76%

-25.91%

+10.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.50%

-25.91%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.48%

-44.78%

+11.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.47%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-8.77%

+4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.69%

-0.81%

Volatility

DRILX vs. DFSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX) is 3.12%, while DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio (DFSTX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that DRILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRILXDFSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

4.40%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

11.55%

-2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.09%

16.78%

-5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

20.56%

-5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

22.08%

-6.33%

DRILX vs. DFSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRILX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than DFSTX's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DRILX vs. DFSTX - Dividend Comparison

DRILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than DFSTX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSTX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio
0.95%1.08%1.05%2.45%5.18%6.39%1.08%3.30%5.16%4.56%3.10%5.90%
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.34%1.47%2.40%3.26%3.97%2.25%2.11%2.12%2.25%0.91%1.96%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRILX and DFSTX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFSTX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to DRILX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRILX dropped -33.48% vs DFSTX's -60.99%.

DRILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRILX and DFSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer