PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWTSX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWTSX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWTSX achieves a 9.15% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SWTSX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 14.89%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.50% annualized return.


SWTSX

1D
1.88%
1M
0.56%
YTD
9.15%
6M
9.22%
1Y
25.64%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
14.89%

SCHG

1D
0.12%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
2.58%
6M
2.96%
1Y
20.32%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
18.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWTSX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWTSX
Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund
9.15%17.04%23.84%26.05%-19.54%25.65%20.71%30.90%-5.35%21.08%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
2.58%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SWTSX and SCHG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.94

The correlation between SWTSX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWTSX vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWTSX
SCHG

Technology

33.8%
46.7%

Financial Services

12.1%
6.6%

Communication Services

10.3%
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
12.4%

Industrials

9.6%
6.0%

Healthcare

9.1%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
1.6%

Energy

3.7%
0.7%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.5%

Utilities

2.3%
0.4%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.3%

Technology

SWTSX
33.8%
SCHG
46.7%

Financial Services

SWTSX
12.1%
SCHG
6.6%

Communication Services

SWTSX
10.3%
SCHG
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SWTSX
10.1%
SCHG
12.4%

Industrials

SWTSX
9.6%
SCHG
6.0%

Healthcare

SWTSX
9.1%
SCHG
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

SWTSX
4.7%
SCHG
1.6%

Energy

SWTSX
3.7%
SCHG
0.7%

Real Estate

SWTSX
2.4%
SCHG
0.5%

Utilities

SWTSX
2.3%
SCHG
0.4%

Basic Materials

SWTSX
2.1%
SCHG
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWTSX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWTSX
SWTSX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SWTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SWTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWTSX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWTSXSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.21

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.14

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.40

3.78

+8.62

SWTSX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWTSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWTSX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWTSX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWTSX drawdown since its inception was -54.60%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWTSX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWTSXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.60%

-34.59%

-20.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-16.41%

+7.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.43%

-23.39%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.40%

-34.59%

+9.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.01%

-34.59%

-0.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

-5.33%

+2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.56%

-5.20%

-5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

4.96%

-2.98%

Volatility

SWTSX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX) is 4.62%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that SWTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWTSXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

5.14%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

12.30%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

15.95%

-3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

22.33%

-4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.63%

21.58%

-2.95%

SWTSX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWTSX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWTSX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SWTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SWTSX
Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund
1.01%1.10%1.24%1.41%1.62%1.46%1.63%1.92%2.58%1.83%2.32%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SWTSX and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHG has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to SWTSX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWTSX dropped -54.60% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

SWTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWTSX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer