SWLRX vs. QQQI
SWLRX (Schwab Monthly Income Fund - Maximum Payout) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both funds - SWLRX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Charles Schwab, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, SWLRX returned 10.74% vs 30.41% for QQQI. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWLRX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
SWLRX vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWLRX achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.43% return.
SWLRX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 4.27%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 10.74%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.70%
- 10Y*
- 3.48%
QQQI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 30.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SWLRX vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SWLRX Schwab Monthly Income Fund - Maximum Payout | 4.27% | 9.85% | 4.20% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.43% | 18.62% | 19.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWLRX and QQQI is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWLRX vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
SWLRX
QQQI
SWLRX vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Monthly Income Fund - Maximum Payout (SWLRX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWLRX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.43 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 3.18 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.33 | 14.27 | -2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWLRX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.35 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.34 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
SWLRX vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWLRX drawdown since its inception was -18.60%, smaller than the maximum QQQI drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLRX and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWLRX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.60% | -20.00% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.49% | -9.61% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.17% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -2.20% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 2.14% | -1.19% |
Volatility
SWLRX vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Monthly Income Fund - Maximum Payout (SWLRX) is 1.34%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that SWLRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWLRX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 2.68% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.33% | 9.85% | -6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.38% | 12.98% | -8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.20% | 17.07% | -10.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 17.07% | -11.94% |
SWLRX vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWLRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWLRX vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
SWLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than QQQI's 13.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.19% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWLRX Schwab Monthly Income Fund - Maximum Payout | 4.58% | 4.63% | 4.94% | 4.10% | 4.63% | 3.07% | 2.19% | 3.22% | 3.30% | 2.47% | 4.00% | 4.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWLRX and QQQI have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQI has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to SWLRX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWLRX dropped -18.60% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
SWLRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWLRX and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer