PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWISX vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWISX vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWISX achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SWISX has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 8.88%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return.


SWISX

1D
-2.52%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
6.62%
6M
9.04%
1Y
18.18%
3Y*
15.81%
5Y*
7.96%
10Y*
8.88%

VOT

1D
0.12%
1M
1.80%
YTD
5.49%
6M
3.73%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWISX vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWISX
Schwab International Index Fund
6.62%31.59%3.54%18.13%-14.30%11.25%8.14%21.87%-13.38%25.32%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
5.49%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SWISX and VOT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2006

0.75

The correlation between SWISX and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWISX vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWISX
VOT

Financial Services

24.4%
6.8%

Industrials

20.3%
23.7%

Technology

10.7%
28.9%

Healthcare

9.2%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
0.8%

Basic Materials

6.1%
1.8%

Communication Services

4.6%
3.8%

Energy

4.1%
2.7%

Utilities

4.0%
3.5%

Real Estate

2.0%
4.8%

Financial Services

SWISX
24.4%
VOT
6.8%

Industrials

SWISX
20.3%
VOT
23.7%

Technology

SWISX
10.7%
VOT
28.9%

Healthcare

SWISX
9.2%
VOT
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SWISX
7.7%
VOT
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

SWISX
7.0%
VOT
0.8%

Basic Materials

SWISX
6.1%
VOT
1.8%

Communication Services

SWISX
4.6%
VOT
3.8%

Energy

SWISX
4.1%
VOT
2.7%

Utilities

SWISX
4.0%
VOT
3.5%

Real Estate

SWISX
2.0%
VOT
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWISX vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWISX
SWISX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SWISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWISX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SWISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWISX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWISX vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWISXVOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.09

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

0.49

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

1.46

+4.69

SWISX vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWISX and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWISXVOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

0.48

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.29

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.57

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.44

-0.14

Drawdowns

SWISX vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWISX drawdown since its inception was -60.65%, roughly equal to the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWISX and VOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWISXVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.65%

-60.16%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-15.96%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-21.77%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.42%

-37.19%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

-37.19%

+3.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.13%

-3.48%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.81%

-9.96%

-4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

5.33%

-2.29%

Volatility

SWISX vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) is 4.52%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that SWISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWISXVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

5.45%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.65%

12.85%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.38%

16.20%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

21.41%

-5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

21.02%

-4.13%

SWISX vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWISX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWISX vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

SWISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than VOT's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWISX
Schwab International Index Fund
3.33%3.55%3.29%3.31%2.73%3.34%1.88%3.09%3.15%2.71%3.19%2.71%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.63%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWISX and VOT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOT has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to SWISX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWISX dropped -60.65% vs VOT's -60.16%.

SWISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWISX and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer