PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWIRX vs. TRRJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWIRX vs. TRRJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2035 Fund (SWIRX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWIRX achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly lower than TRRJX's 9.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SWIRX having a 9.48% annualized return and TRRJX not far ahead at 9.82%.


SWIRX

1D
0.15%
1M
3.45%
YTD
8.18%
6M
8.62%
1Y
20.37%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
9.48%

TRRJX

1D
0.39%
1M
3.73%
YTD
9.32%
6M
4.93%
1Y
15.92%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWIRX vs. TRRJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWIRX
Schwab Target 2035 Fund
8.18%16.49%11.73%17.92%-17.91%14.21%14.05%21.85%-8.24%19.13%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
9.32%10.96%11.99%18.14%-17.96%15.21%17.04%23.72%-6.95%20.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SWIRX and TRRJX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2008

0.97

The correlation between SWIRX and TRRJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWIRX vs. TRRJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWIRX
SWIRX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SWIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SWIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRJX
TRRJX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TRRJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWIRX vs. TRRJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2035 Fund (SWIRX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWIRXTRRJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.31

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.06

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.49

7.96

+4.53

SWIRX vs. TRRJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWIRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the TRRJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWIRX and TRRJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWIRXTRRJXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

1.59

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.52

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.73

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.51

+0.04

Drawdowns

SWIRX vs. TRRJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWIRX drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, smaller than the maximum TRRJX drawdown of -53.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWIRX and TRRJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWIRXTRRJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.53%

-53.57%

+12.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.27%

-8.06%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.60%

-12.52%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.70%

-25.85%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.70%

-30.14%

+1.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-6.65%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

2.06%

-0.41%

Volatility

SWIRX vs. TRRJX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Target 2035 Fund (SWIRX) is 2.66%, while T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that SWIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRRJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWIRXTRRJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.95%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

8.89%

-1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.00%

10.45%

-1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

12.83%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.49%

13.54%

-0.05%

SWIRX vs. TRRJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWIRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TRRJX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWIRX vs. TRRJX - Dividend Comparison

SWIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, while TRRJX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWIRX
Schwab Target 2035 Fund
6.30%6.82%3.96%3.42%7.40%5.81%2.87%6.33%7.12%3.37%5.74%8.16%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
0.00%0.00%2.36%4.68%9.67%6.89%4.80%5.68%8.55%3.80%2.89%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SWIRX and TRRJX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRRJX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to SWIRX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWIRX dropped -41.53% vs TRRJX's -53.57%.

SWIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWIRX and TRRJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer