SWIRX vs. SWDRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Target 2035 Fund (SWIRX) and Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX).
SWIRX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Mar 11, 2008. SWDRX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005.
Performance
SWIRX vs. SWDRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWIRX vs. SWDRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWIRX Schwab Target 2035 Fund | -3.23% | 16.49% | 11.73% | 17.92% | -17.91% | 14.21% | 14.05% | 21.85% | -8.24% | 19.13% |
SWDRX Schwab Target 2030 Fund | -2.75% | 14.87% | 10.52% | 16.38% | -17.00% | 12.52% | 13.49% | 20.41% | -7.20% | 17.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWIRX achieves a -3.23% return, which is significantly lower than SWDRX's -2.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SWIRX has outperformed SWDRX with an annualized return of 8.46%, while SWDRX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.79% annualized return.
SWIRX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -6.98%
- YTD
- -3.23%
- 6M
- -0.93%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 11.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
SWDRX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -6.06%
- YTD
- -2.75%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 11.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWIRX vs. SWDRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWIRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWDRX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SWIRX vs. SWDRX — Risk / Return Rank
SWIRX
SWDRX
SWIRX vs. SWDRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2035 Fund (SWIRX) and Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWIRX | SWDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 1.14 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 1.64 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 1.45 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.29 | 6.49 | -0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWIRX | SWDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.14 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.44 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.64 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWIRX and SWDRX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWIRX vs. SWDRX - Dividend Comparison
SWIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, less than SWDRX's 8.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWIRX Schwab Target 2035 Fund | 7.05% | 6.82% | 3.96% | 3.42% | 7.40% | 5.81% | 2.87% | 6.33% | 7.12% | 3.37% | 5.74% | 8.16% |
SWDRX Schwab Target 2030 Fund | 8.54% | 8.31% | 6.37% | 4.28% | 6.77% | 6.92% | 3.23% | 6.60% | 7.03% | 4.86% | 5.87% | 9.35% |
Drawdowns
SWIRX vs. SWDRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWIRX drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, smaller than the maximum SWDRX drawdown of -45.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWIRX and SWDRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWIRX | SWDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.53% | -45.34% | +3.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -7.27% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.70% | -28.17% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.70% | -28.17% | -0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.27% | -6.22% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.13% | -6.53% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 1.62% | +0.25% |
Volatility
SWIRX vs. SWDRX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Target 2035 Fund (SWIRX) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX) at 3.28%. This indicates that SWIRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWIRX | SWDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 3.28% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.73% | 5.75% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 10.03% | +1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 12.55% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.45% | 12.25% | +1.20% |