SWIRX vs. SWAGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SWIRX (Schwab Target 2035 Fund) and SWAGX (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SWIRX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SWAGX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Charles Schwab. Over the past 5 years, SWIRX returned 7.47%/yr vs -0.11%/yr for SWAGX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWIRX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWAGX.

Performance

SWIRX vs. SWAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2035 Fund (SWIRX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWIRX achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly higher than SWAGX's 0.16% return.

SWIRX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 8.62%
• 1Y: 20.37%
• 3Y*: 15.27%
• 5Y*: 7.47%
• 10Y*: 9.48%

SWAGX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 4.54%
• 3Y*: 3.89%
• 5Y*: -0.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWIRX vs. SWAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWIRX Schwab Target 2035 Fund	8.18%	16.49%	11.73%	17.92%	-17.91%	14.21%	14.05%	21.85%	-8.24%	13.48%
SWAGX Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund	0.16%	7.11%	1.38%	5.46%	-13.62%	-2.29%	7.39%	8.64%	-0.11%	2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SWIRX and SWAGX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2017	0.12

Over the past year, SWIRX and SWAGX have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

SWIRX vs. SWAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWIRX

SWIRX Risk / Return Rank: 59
SWIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SWIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SWIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SWIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SWIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

SWAGX

SWAGX Risk / Return Rank: 20
SWAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
SWAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
SWAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
SWAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
SWAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWIRX vs. SWAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2035 Fund (SWIRX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWIRX	SWAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	1.28	+1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	1.95	+1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.22	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	1.69	+1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.49	5.10	+7.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWIRX vs. SWAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWIRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the SWAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWIRX and SWAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWIRX	SWAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	1.28	+1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	-0.02	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.31	+0.24

Drawdowns

SWIRX vs. SWAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWIRX drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, which is greater than SWAGX's maximum drawdown of -19.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWIRX and SWAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWIRX	SWAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.53%	-19.68%	-21.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.27%	-3.05%	-4.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.60%	-6.14%	-5.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.70%	-18.76%	-9.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.60%	+3.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.08%	-5.68%	-0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	1.01%	+0.64%

Volatility

SWIRX vs. SWAGX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2035 Fund (SWIRX) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) at 1.32%. This indicates that SWIRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWIRX	SWAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	1.32%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.14%	2.90%	+4.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.00%	4.02%	+4.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.57%	6.08%	+7.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.49%	5.11%	+8.38%

SWIRX vs. SWAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWIRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWAGX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWIRX vs. SWAGX - Dividend Comparison

SWIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than SWAGX's 4.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SWAGX Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund	4.14%	4.02%	3.88%	3.22%	1.93%	1.56%	2.47%	2.87%	2.80%	1.98%	0.00%	0.00%
SWIRX Schwab Target 2035 Fund	6.30%	6.82%	3.96%	3.42%	7.40%	5.81%	2.87%	6.33%	7.12%	3.37%	5.74%	8.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWIRX and SWAGX in my portfolio?

SWIRX and SWAGX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWIRX or SWAGX?

SWIRX has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to SWAGX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWIRX dropped -41.53% vs SWAGX's -19.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SWIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.