PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWHGX vs. SNXFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWHGX vs. SNXFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWHGX achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly lower than SNXFX's 11.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SWHGX has underperformed SNXFX with an annualized return of 10.40%, while SNXFX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.26% annualized return.


SWHGX

1D
0.07%
1M
3.12%
YTD
9.99%
6M
10.81%
1Y
23.95%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
10.40%

SNXFX

1D
0.25%
1M
5.18%
YTD
11.62%
6M
11.92%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
15.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWHGX vs. SNXFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWHGX
Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™
9.99%17.49%11.76%18.22%-15.06%18.09%11.02%22.23%-7.19%16.11%
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
11.62%17.23%24.46%26.53%-19.46%26.10%20.71%31.43%-5.04%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SWHGX and SNXFX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1996

0.96

The correlation between SWHGX and SNXFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWHGX vs. SNXFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWHGX
SWHGX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SWHGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWHGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWHGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SWHGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWHGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SNXFX
SNXFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SNXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SNXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWHGX vs. SNXFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWHGXSNXFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

2.46

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

3.34

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

3.32

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.51

15.35

-0.83

SWHGX vs. SNXFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWHGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the SNXFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWHGX and SNXFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWHGXSNXFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.46

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.78

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.82

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.58

-0.06

Drawdowns

SWHGX vs. SNXFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWHGX drawdown since its inception was -49.19%, smaller than the maximum SNXFX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHGX and SNXFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWHGXSNXFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.19%

-55.08%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.38%

-8.94%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-19.21%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

-25.36%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.77%

-34.58%

+4.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-8.76%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.93%

-0.25%

Volatility

SWHGX vs. SNXFX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) have volatilities of 2.82% and 2.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWHGXSNXFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.87%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

9.14%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.80%

12.14%

-2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.55%

17.31%

-3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

18.73%

-4.48%

SWHGX vs. SNXFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWHGX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SNXFX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWHGX vs. SNXFX - Dividend Comparison

SWHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, more than SNXFX's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
1.30%1.45%1.23%1.41%1.61%1.74%2.76%3.01%6.49%4.23%3.41%6.31%
SWHGX
Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™
8.72%9.59%11.68%4.00%4.53%5.04%8.15%5.76%5.76%4.87%3.73%14.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SWHGX and SNXFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SNXFX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to SWHGX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWHGX dropped -49.19% vs SNXFX's -55.08%.

SWHGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWHGX and SNXFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer