SWHGX vs. AOA
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA).
SWHGX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Nov 19, 1995. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Performance
SWHGX vs. AOA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWHGX vs. AOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWHGX Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ | -0.60% | 17.49% | 11.76% | 18.22% | -15.06% | 18.09% | 11.02% | 22.23% | -7.19% | 16.11% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | -0.59% | 19.59% | 13.55% | 18.27% | -16.23% | 15.42% | 12.82% | 22.60% | -7.86% | 20.05% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SWHGX having a -0.60% return and AOA slightly higher at -0.59%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SWHGX having a 9.54% annualized return and AOA not far ahead at 9.69%.
SWHGX
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -4.60%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
AOA
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWHGX vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWHGX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWHGX vs. AOA — Risk / Return Rank
SWHGX
AOA
SWHGX vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWHGX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 1.97 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.98 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.29 | 8.82 | -0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWHGX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.62 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.72 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.65 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWHGX and AOA is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWHGX vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison
SWHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.65%, more than AOA's 2.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWHGX Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ | 9.65% | 9.59% | 11.68% | 4.00% | 4.53% | 5.04% | 8.15% | 5.76% | 5.76% | 4.87% | 3.73% | 14.80% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.19% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.26% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
SWHGX vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWHGX drawdown since its inception was -49.19%, which is greater than AOA's maximum drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHGX and AOA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWHGX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.19% | -28.38% | -20.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | -9.62% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.63% | -23.62% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.77% | -28.38% | -1.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.31% | -5.18% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.21% | -4.08% | -3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 2.16% | -0.08% |
Volatility
SWHGX vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) is 4.74%, while iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a volatility of 5.28%. This indicates that SWHGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWHGX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 5.28% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 8.34% | -0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 13.87% | -0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.53% | 12.92% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 13.51% | +0.72% |