PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWHGX vs. SFLNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWHGX vs. SFLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWHGX achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly lower than SFLNX's 14.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SWHGX has underperformed SFLNX with an annualized return of 10.43%, while SFLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.


SWHGX

1D
0.27%
1M
3.95%
YTD
10.29%
6M
10.70%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
16.82%
5Y*
8.99%
10Y*
10.43%

SFLNX

1D
0.46%
1M
4.08%
YTD
14.66%
6M
14.73%
1Y
32.46%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWHGX vs. SFLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWHGX
Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™
10.29%17.49%11.76%18.22%-15.06%18.09%11.02%22.23%-7.19%16.11%
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
14.66%17.02%16.78%18.16%-6.89%31.64%9.12%28.91%-7.43%17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SWHGX and SFLNX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.95

The correlation between SWHGX and SFLNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWHGX vs. SFLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWHGX
SWHGX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SWHGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWHGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWHGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SWHGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWHGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SFLNX
SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWHGX vs. SFLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWHGXSFLNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.59

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

5.47

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.47

21.47

-7.01

SWHGX vs. SFLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWHGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the SFLNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWHGX and SFLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWHGXSFLNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

3.23

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.85

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.78

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.53

-0.01

Drawdowns

SWHGX vs. SFLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWHGX drawdown since its inception was -49.19%, smaller than the maximum SFLNX drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHGX and SFLNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWHGXSFLNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.19%

-56.18%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.38%

-6.10%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-16.27%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

-18.98%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.77%

-37.59%

+7.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-6.01%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.55%

+0.13%

Volatility

SWHGX vs. SFLNX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) at 2.48%. This indicates that SWHGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWHGXSFLNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.48%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

7.43%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.78%

10.35%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.55%

15.26%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

18.40%

-4.15%

SWHGX vs. SFLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWHGX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SFLNX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWHGX vs. SFLNX - Dividend Comparison

SWHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.69%, more than SFLNX's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
1.46%1.68%1.78%1.86%2.09%4.78%6.17%5.33%9.69%3.28%7.23%5.68%
SWHGX
Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™
8.69%9.59%11.68%4.00%4.53%5.04%8.15%5.76%5.76%4.87%3.73%14.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWHGX and SFLNX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWHGX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to SFLNX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWHGX dropped -49.19% vs SFLNX's -56.18%.

SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWHGX and SFLNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer