SWHGX vs. SCHV
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV).
SWHGX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Nov 19, 1995. SCHV is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
SWHGX vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWHGX vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWHGX Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ | -0.60% | 17.49% | 11.76% | 18.22% | -15.06% | 18.09% | 11.02% | 22.23% | -7.19% | 16.11% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 3.89% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 2.64% | 25.92% | -7.30% | 16.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWHGX achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 3.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SWHGX has underperformed SCHV with an annualized return of 9.54%, while SCHV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.62% annualized return.
SWHGX
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -4.60%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- 17.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWHGX vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWHGX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWHGX vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
SWHGX
SCHV
SWHGX vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWHGX | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 1.15 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 1.64 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.25 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.48 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.29 | 6.91 | +1.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWHGX | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.15 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.65 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.63 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.68 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWHGX and SCHV is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWHGX vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
SWHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.65%, more than SCHV's 1.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWHGX Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ | 9.65% | 9.59% | 11.68% | 4.00% | 4.53% | 5.04% | 8.15% | 5.76% | 5.76% | 4.87% | 3.73% | 14.80% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.96% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Drawdowns
SWHGX vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWHGX drawdown since its inception was -49.19%, which is greater than SCHV's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHGX and SCHV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWHGX | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.19% | -37.08% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | -11.93% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.63% | -19.78% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.77% | -37.08% | +7.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.31% | -4.58% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.21% | -3.86% | -3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 2.55% | -0.47% |
Volatility
SWHGX vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) at 4.13%. This indicates that SWHGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWHGX | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 4.13% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 8.08% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 15.42% | -2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.53% | 14.48% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 16.91% | -2.68% |