PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWHFX vs. PYEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWHFX vs. PYEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PYEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWHFX achieves a -3.53% return, which is significantly lower than PYEMX's 3.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SWHFX has outperformed PYEMX with an annualized return of 7.48%, while PYEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.44% annualized return.


SWHFX

1D
-0.73%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
-3.53%
6M
-3.87%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
3.37%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
7.48%

PYEMX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.21%
YTD
3.42%
6M
3.91%
1Y
14.60%
3Y*
11.70%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
4.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWHFX vs. PYEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWHFX
Schwab Health Care Fund™
-3.53%9.81%0.10%0.73%-4.66%23.36%12.83%17.64%3.68%20.31%
PYEMX
Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund
3.42%15.27%7.93%12.35%-17.39%-2.37%6.16%16.40%-7.03%12.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SWHFX and PYEMX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWHFX vs. PYEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWHFX
SWHFX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SWHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SWHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

PYEMX
PYEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PYEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PYEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWHFX vs. PYEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PYEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWHFXPYEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.69

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

3.11

-2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.06

12.87

-11.81

SWHFX vs. PYEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWHFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the PYEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWHFX and PYEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWHFX vs. PYEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWHFX drawdown since its inception was -43.10%, which is greater than PYEMX's maximum drawdown of -30.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHFX and PYEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWHFXPYEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.10%

-30.26%

-12.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.74%

-4.68%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-7.08%

-12.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

-30.26%

+10.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.28%

-30.26%

+2.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.54%

-0.27%

-10.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-4.01%

-4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.30%

1.13%

+5.17%

Volatility

SWHFX vs. PYEMX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PYEMX) at 1.34%. This indicates that SWHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWHFXPYEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

1.34%

+3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.40%

3.87%

+8.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.03%

4.52%

+11.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.71%

6.64%

+8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

6.62%

+9.37%

SWHFX vs. PYEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWHFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PYEMX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWHFX vs. PYEMX - Dividend Comparison

SWHFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PYEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYEMX
Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund
6.59%6.61%7.36%6.10%7.80%5.73%4.66%5.46%6.18%5.40%5.60%5.25%
SWHFX
Schwab Health Care Fund™
0.00%0.00%9.49%3.60%4.18%12.52%11.47%4.56%10.02%7.32%2.63%16.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWHFX and PYEMX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWHFX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to PYEMX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWHFX dropped -43.10% vs PYEMX's -30.26%.

PYEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWHFX and PYEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer