PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYEMX vs. PYLMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYEMX vs. PYLMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PYEMX) and Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYEMX achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly higher than PYLMX's 1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, PYEMX has outperformed PYLMX with an annualized return of 4.47%, while PYLMX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.77% annualized return.


PYEMX

1D
0.27%
1M
1.49%
YTD
2.78%
6M
3.45%
1Y
14.98%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
3.10%
10Y*
4.47%

PYLMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.79%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
2.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYEMX vs. PYLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYEMX
Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund
2.78%15.27%7.93%12.35%-17.39%-2.37%6.16%16.40%-7.03%12.00%
PYLMX
Payden Limited Maturity Fund
1.39%5.22%6.08%5.34%0.56%0.19%1.85%3.34%1.76%1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PYEMX and PYLMX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999

0.15

The correlation between PYEMX and PYLMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYEMX vs. PYLMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYEMX
PYEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PYEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PYEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLMX
PYLMX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PYLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYEMX vs. PYLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PYEMX) and Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYEMXPYLMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.43

2.96

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.49

8.04

-2.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

2.49

-0.74

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

8.87

-5.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.52

38.00

-24.47

PYEMX vs. PYLMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.43, which is comparable to the PYLMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYEMX and PYLMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYEMXPYLMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43

2.96

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

2.74

-2.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

2.13

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

2.39

-1.24

Drawdowns

PYEMX vs. PYLMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYEMX drawdown since its inception was -30.26%, which is greater than PYLMX's maximum drawdown of -5.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYEMX and PYLMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYEMXPYLMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.26%

-5.56%

-24.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.68%

-0.52%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.08%

-0.52%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.26%

-1.24%

-29.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.26%

-5.56%

-24.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-0.16%

-3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

0.12%

+1.01%

Volatility

PYEMX vs. PYLMX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PYEMX) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) at 0.48%. This indicates that PYEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYEMXPYLMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

0.48%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.75%

1.09%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.45%

1.56%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.63%

1.36%

+5.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.62%

1.31%

+5.31%

PYEMX vs. PYLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYEMX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than PYLMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYEMX vs. PYLMX - Dividend Comparison

PYEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, more than PYLMX's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYEMX
Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund
6.63%6.61%7.36%6.10%7.80%5.73%4.66%5.46%6.18%5.40%5.60%5.25%
PYLMX
Payden Limited Maturity Fund
4.51%4.96%5.36%3.79%1.83%0.50%1.39%2.54%2.28%1.42%0.91%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYEMX and PYLMX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYEMX has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to PYLMX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYEMX dropped -30.26% vs PYLMX's -5.56%.

PYEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYEMX and PYLMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer