PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWERX vs. FRAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWERX vs. FRAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWERX achieves a 9.28% return, which is significantly higher than FRAMX's 3.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SWERX has outperformed FRAMX with an annualized return of 10.19%, while FRAMX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.94% annualized return.


SWERX

1D
0.19%
1M
3.86%
YTD
9.28%
6M
9.85%
1Y
22.49%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
10.19%

FRAMX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.52%
YTD
3.94%
6M
4.15%
1Y
10.14%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
3.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWERX vs. FRAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWERX
Schwab Target 2040 Fund
9.28%17.71%12.74%19.06%-18.57%15.65%14.44%23.01%-9.11%20.48%
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
3.94%9.55%4.04%7.80%-11.87%2.52%8.30%10.28%-2.05%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SWERX and FRAMX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.87

The correlation between SWERX and FRAMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (5 years) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWERX vs. FRAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWERX
SWERX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SWERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWERX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SWERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWERX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FRAMX
FRAMX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FRAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FRAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWERX vs. FRAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWERXFRAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.49

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.96

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.49

12.58

-0.09

SWERX vs. FRAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWERX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FRAMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWERX and FRAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWERXFRAMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.46

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.50

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.88

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.52

+0.01

Drawdowns

SWERX vs. FRAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWERX drawdown since its inception was -48.24%, which is greater than FRAMX's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWERX and FRAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWERXFRAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.24%

-33.94%

-14.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-3.45%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.05%

-5.02%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.40%

-16.31%

-14.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

-16.31%

-14.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-3.83%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

0.81%

+1.01%

Volatility

SWERX vs. FRAMX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) at 1.67%. This indicates that SWERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWERXFRAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

1.67%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

3.43%

+4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.00%

4.16%

+5.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

5.28%

+9.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

4.52%

+10.32%

SWERX vs. FRAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWERX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FRAMX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWERX vs. FRAMX - Dividend Comparison

SWERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than FRAMX's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
2.84%2.77%2.77%2.58%4.26%3.31%2.23%2.37%4.40%8.26%1.42%1.42%
SWERX
Schwab Target 2040 Fund
6.58%7.19%5.00%3.83%8.31%6.96%3.33%7.69%8.57%4.13%6.76%10.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWERX and FRAMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWERX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to FRAMX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWERX dropped -48.24% vs FRAMX's -33.94%.

FRAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWERX and FRAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer