FRAMX vs. TCLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund (TCLTX).
FRAMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 30, 2007. TCLTX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 14, 2004.
Performance
FRAMX vs. TCLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRAMX vs. TCLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRAMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A | -0.57% | 9.55% | 4.04% | 7.80% | -11.87% | 2.52% | 8.30% | 10.28% | -2.05% | 6.82% |
TCLTX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund | -2.54% | 12.09% | 8.17% | 11.68% | -13.76% | 8.19% | 12.11% | 17.49% | -5.43% | 12.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRAMX achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly higher than TCLTX's -2.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FRAMX has underperformed TCLTX with an annualized return of 3.65%, while TCLTX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.20% annualized return.
FRAMX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 6.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 3.65%
TCLTX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- -2.54%
- 6M
- -0.65%
- 1Y
- 8.67%
- 3Y*
- 8.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.94%
- 10Y*
- 6.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRAMX vs. TCLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRAMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TCLTX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRAMX vs. TCLTX — Risk / Return Rank
FRAMX
TCLTX
FRAMX vs. TCLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund (TCLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRAMX | TCLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | 1.23 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.09 | 1.74 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.25 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 1.52 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.06 | 6.37 | +1.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRAMX | TCLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.23 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.52 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.75 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRAMX and TCLTX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRAMX vs. TCLTX - Dividend Comparison
FRAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than TCLTX's 4.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRAMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A | 2.91% | 2.77% | 2.77% | 2.58% | 4.26% | 3.31% | 2.23% | 2.37% | 4.40% | 8.26% | 1.42% | 1.42% |
TCLTX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund | 4.60% | 4.49% | 3.33% | 2.38% | 5.36% | 7.49% | 4.91% | 3.36% | 6.53% | 2.44% | 5.09% | 4.63% |
Drawdowns
FRAMX vs. TCLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRAMX drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum TCLTX drawdown of -44.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRAMX and TCLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRAMX | TCLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -44.15% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.45% | -5.39% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.31% | -18.99% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.31% | -20.39% | +4.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | -5.01% | +1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.87% | -5.24% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 1.29% | -0.43% |
Volatility
FRAMX vs. TCLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) is 1.96%, while TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund (TCLTX) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that FRAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRAMX | TCLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 2.49% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 4.26% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 7.24% | -2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.21% | 7.59% | -2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 8.32% | -3.85% |