PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRAMX vs. FSXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRAMX vs. FSXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) and Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRAMX achieves a 1,644,791.35% return, which is significantly higher than FSXAX's 9.20% return.


FRAMX

1D
0.00%
1M
1,599,541.56%
YTD
1,644,791.35%
6M
1,646,729.43%
1Y
1,734,538.09%
3Y*
2,587.16%
5Y*
609.67%
10Y*
173.41%

FSXAX

1D
1.01%
1M
2.20%
YTD
9.20%
6M
9.19%
1Y
20.24%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRAMX vs. FSXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
1,644,791.35%9.55%4.04%5.06%
FSXAX
Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund
9.20%16.00%10.39%9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FRAMX and FSXAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2023

0.87

The correlation between FRAMX and FSXAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRAMX vs. FSXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRAMX
FRAMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FRAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

FSXAX
FSXAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FSXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRAMX vs. FSXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) and Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRAMXFSXAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+548,063.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

76,256.04

1.40

+76,254.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

523,251.81

2.91

+523,248.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,184,998.29

12.36

+2,184,985.94

FRAMX vs. FSXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the FSXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRAMX and FSXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRAMX vs. FSXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRAMX drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than FSXAX's maximum drawdown of -10.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRAMX and FSXAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRAMXFSXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-10.04%

-23.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.45%

-6.87%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-10.04%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-1.47%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

1.62%

-0.80%

Volatility

FRAMX vs. FSXAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) has a higher volatility of 967.30% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX) at 4.03%. This indicates that FRAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRAMXFSXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

967.30%

4.03%

+963.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

967.35%

8.04%

+959.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1,589,373.65%

9.42%

+1,589,364.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

712,204.02%

9.83%

+712,194.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

503,203.49%

9.83%

+503,193.66%

FRAMX vs. FSXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRAMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FSXAX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRAMX vs. FSXAX - Dividend Comparison

FRAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.97%, more than FSXAX's 2.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
102.97%2.77%2.77%2.58%4.26%3.31%2.23%2.37%4.40%8.26%1.42%1.42%
FSXAX
Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund
2.14%2.21%3.97%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FRAMX and FSXAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRAMX has higher volatility (967.30%) compared to FSXAX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRAMX dropped -33.94% vs FSXAX's -10.04%.

FSXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRAMX and FSXAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer