SWDRX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
SWDRX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
SWDRX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWDRX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDRX Schwab Target 2030 Fund | -2.75% | 14.87% | 10.52% | 16.38% | -17.00% | 12.52% | 13.49% | 20.41% | -7.20% | 0.27% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWDRX achieves a -2.75% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
SWDRX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -6.06%
- YTD
- -2.75%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 11.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWDRX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWDRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SWDRX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
SWDRX
SWLGX
SWDRX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWDRX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.66 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.10 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.15 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 0.72 | +0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | 2.51 | +3.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWDRX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.66 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.56 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.68 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWDRX and SWLGX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWDRX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
SWDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.54%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDRX Schwab Target 2030 Fund | 8.54% | 8.31% | 6.37% | 4.28% | 6.77% | 6.92% | 3.23% | 6.60% | 7.03% | 4.86% | 5.87% | 9.35% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SWDRX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWDRX drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDRX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWDRX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.34% | -32.69% | -12.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.27% | -16.16% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.17% | -32.69% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.22% | -16.16% | +9.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.53% | -7.13% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 4.62% | -3.00% |
Volatility
SWDRX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX) is 3.28%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that SWDRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWDRX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 5.38% | -2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.75% | 11.82% | -6.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.03% | 22.31% | -12.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 21.47% | -8.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 22.78% | -10.53% |