SWDRX vs. SNXFX
SWDRX (Schwab Target 2030 Fund) and SNXFX (Schwab 1000 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SWDRX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SNXFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Schwab 1000 Index. Over the past 10 years, SWDRX returned 8.60%/yr vs 15.26%/yr for SNXFX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SWDRX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SNXFX.
Performance
SWDRX vs. SNXFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWDRX achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than SNXFX's 11.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SWDRX has underperformed SNXFX with an annualized return of 8.60%, while SNXFX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.26% annualized return.
SWDRX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- 17.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
SNXFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 29.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.48%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- 15.26%
SWDRX vs. SNXFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDRX Schwab Target 2030 Fund | 6.57% | 14.87% | 10.52% | 16.38% | -17.00% | 12.52% | 13.49% | 20.41% | -7.20% | 17.55% |
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | 11.62% | 17.23% | 24.46% | 26.53% | -19.46% | 26.10% | 20.71% | 31.43% | -5.04% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWDRX and SNXFX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2005 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SWDRX and SNXFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SWDRX vs. SNXFX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SWDRX
SNXFX
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
SWDRX
SNXFX
Financial Services
SWDRX
SNXFX
Industrials
SWDRX
SNXFX
Healthcare
SWDRX
SNXFX
Consumer Cyclical
SWDRX
SNXFX
Communication Services
SWDRX
SNXFX
Real Estate
SWDRX
SNXFX
Consumer Defensive
SWDRX
SNXFX
Energy
SWDRX
SNXFX
Basic Materials
SWDRX
SNXFX
Utilities
SWDRX
SNXFX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWDRX vs. SNXFX — Risk / Return Rank
SWDRX
SNXFX
SWDRX vs. SNXFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWDRX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.31 | 2.46 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.29 | 3.34 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.44 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 3.32 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 15.35 | -2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWDRX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.46 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.78 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.82 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.58 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
SWDRX vs. SNXFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWDRX drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, smaller than the maximum SNXFX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDRX and SNXFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWDRX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.34% | -55.08% | +9.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | -8.94% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.71% | -19.21% | +9.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.17% | -25.36% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.17% | -34.58% | +6.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.48% | -8.76% | +2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 1.93% | -0.50% |
Volatility
SWDRX vs. SNXFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX) is 2.35%, while Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that SWDRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNXFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWDRX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 2.87% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.11% | 9.14% | -3.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.74% | 12.14% | -4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.58% | 17.31% | -4.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.27% | 18.73% | -6.46% |
SWDRX vs. SNXFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWDRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SNXFX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWDRX vs. SNXFX - Dividend Comparison
SWDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.80%, more than SNXFX's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | 1.30% | 1.45% | 1.23% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.74% | 2.76% | 3.01% | 6.49% | 4.23% | 3.41% | 6.31% |
SWDRX Schwab Target 2030 Fund | 7.80% | 8.31% | 6.37% | 4.28% | 6.77% | 6.92% | 3.23% | 6.60% | 7.03% | 4.86% | 5.87% | 9.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SWDRX and SNXFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SNXFX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to SWDRX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWDRX dropped -45.34% vs SNXFX's -55.08%.
SNXFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWDRX and SNXFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer